ArticleBMC bioinformatics2004
Profiled support vector machines for antisense oligonucleotide efficacy prediction.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Chemical Diversity of Locked Nucleic Acid-Modified Antisense Oligonucleotides Allows Optimization of Pharmaceutical Properties.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2020Article
- Survival Prediction and Feature Selection in Patients with Breast Cancer Using Support Vector Regression.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2016Article
- Prediction of antisense oligonucleotides using structural and thermodynamic motifs.Bioinformation · 2012Article
- Ezrin mRNA target site selection for DNAzymes using secondary structure and hybridization thermodynamics.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2011Article
- Fundamental differences in the equilibrium considerations for siRNA and antisense oligodeoxynucleotide design.Nucleic acids research · 2008Article
- Identification of sequence motifs significantly associated with antisense activity.BMC bioinformatics · 2007Article
- More complete gene silencing by fewer siRNAs: transparent optimized design and biophysical signature.Nucleic acids research · 2007Article
- Selection of antisense oligonucleotides based on multiple predicted target mRNA structures.BMC bioinformatics · 2006Article
- AOBase: a database for antisense oligonucleotides selection and design.Nucleic acids research · 2006Article
- Profiled support vector machines for antisense oligonucleotide efficacy prediction.BMC bioinformatics · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis paper presents the use of Support Vector Machines (SVMs) for prediction and analysis of antisense oligonucleotide (AO) efficacy. The collected database comprises 315 AO molecules including 68 features each, inducing a problem well-suited to SVMs. The task of feature selection is crucial given the presence of noisy or redundant features, and the well-known problem of the curse of dimensionality. We propose a two-stage strategy to develop an optimal model: (1) feature selection using correlation analysis, mutual information, and SVM-based recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE), and (2) AO prediction using standard and profiled SVM formulations. A profiled SVM gives different weights to different parts of the training data to focus the training on the most important regions.
resultsIn the first stage, the SVM-RFE technique was most efficient and robust in the presence of low number of samples and high input space dimension. This method yielded an optimal subset of 14 representative features, which were all related to energy and sequence motifs. The second stage evaluated the performance of the predictors (overall correlation coefficient between observed and predicted efficacy, r; mean error, ME; and root-mean-square-error, RMSE) using 8-fold and minus-one-RNA cross-validation methods. The profiled SVM produced the best results (r = 0.44, ME = 0.022, and RMSE= 0.278) and predicted high (>75% inhibition of gene expression) and low efficacy (<25%) AOs with a success rate of 83.3% and 82.9%, respectively, which is better than by previous approaches. A web server for AO prediction is available online at http://aosvm.cgb.ki.se/.
conclusionsThe SVM approach is well suited to the AO prediction problem, and yields a prediction accuracy superior to previous methods. The profiled SVM was found to perform better than the standard SVM, suggesting that it could lead to improvements in other prediction problems as well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.