Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15379436›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2004

A pharmacokinetic comparison of meloxicam and ketoprofen following oral administration to healthy dogs.

L Montoya, L Ambros, V Kreil, R Bonafine, G Albarellos, R Hallu, A Soraci

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Pharmacokinetics of Single-dose Subcutaneous Meloxicam Injections in Black-tailed Prairie Dogs (Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2017
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Multi-Injection Pharmacokinetics of Meloxicam in Kemp's RidleyAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Pharmacokinetics of 3 formulations of meloxicam in cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis).Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2014
    Article
  15. Aqueous stability and oral pharmacokinetics of meloxicam and carprofen in male C57BL/6 mice.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2013
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

L MontoyaArea de Farmacologia, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina. lmontoya@fvet.uba.ar
L Ambros
V Kreil
R Bonafine
G Albarellos
R Hallu
A Soraci

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ketoprofen (KTP) and meloxicam (MLX) are non-steroidal anti-inflamatory drugs used extensively in veterinary medicine. The pharmacokinetics of these drugs were studied in eight dogs following a single oral dose of 1 mg/kg of KTP as a racemate or 0.2 mg/kg of MLX. The concentrations of the drugs in plasma were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). There were differences between the disposition curves of the KTP enantiomers, confirming that the pharmacokinetics of KTP is enantioselective. (S)-(+)-KTP was the predominant enantiomer; the S:R ratio in the plasma increased from 2.58 +/- 0.38 at 15 min to 5.72 +/- 2.35 at 1 h. The area under the concentration time curve (AUC) of (S)-(+)-KTP was approximately 6 times greater than that of (R)-(-)-KTP. The mean (+/- SD) pharmacokinetic parameters for (S)-(+)-KTP were characterized as Tmax = 0.76 +/- 0.19 h, Cmax = 2.02 +/- 0.41 microg/ml, t1/2el = 1.65 +/- 0.48 h, AUC = 6.06 +/- 1.16 microg.h/ml, Vd/F = 0.39 +/- 0.07 L/kg, Cl/F = 170 +/- 39 ml/(kg.h). The mean (+/- SD) pharmacokinetic parameters of MLX were Tmax = 8.5 +/- 1.91 h, Cmax = 0.82 +/- 0.29 microg/ml, t1/2lambda(z) = 12.13 +/- 2.15 h, AUCinf = 15.41 +/- 1.24 microg.h/ml, Vd/F = 0.23 +/- 0.03 L/ kg, and Cl/F = 10 +/- 1.4 ml/(kg.h). Our results indicate significant pharmacokinetic differences between MLX and KTP after therapeutic doses.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalArea Under CurveChromatography, High Pressure LiquidDogsFemaleHalf-LifeKetoprofenMaleMeloxicamMetabolic Clearance RateReference ValuesThiazinesThiazolesAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalKetoprofenMeloxicamThiazinesThiazoles

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.