Trial reportWiener klinische Wochenschrift2004
Effect of hospitalization and antimicrobial therapy on antimicrobial resistance of colonizing Staphylococcus epidermidis.
Trial report in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antimicrobial susceptibility, virulence determinants profiles and molecular characteristics of Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates in Wenzhou, eastern China.BMC microbiology · 2019Article
- Methicillin Resistant Staphylococci: Prevalence and susceptibility patterns in a burn center in Ahvaz from 2013-2014.Iranian journal of microbiology · 2015Article
- Development of a poly(ether urethane) system for the controlled release of two novel anti-biofilm agents based on gallium or zinc and its efficacy to prevent bacterial biofilm formation.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2013Article
- Alteration of the colonization pattern of coagulase-negative staphylococci in patients undergoing treatment for hematological malignancy.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2012Article
- Epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance of staphylococci isolated from different infectious diseases.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2010Article
- Proof of principle for successful characterization of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from skin by use of Raman spectroscopy and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2010Article
- Antimicrobial activity of some sulfonamide derivatives on clinical isolates of Staphylococus aureus.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endogenous infections with multi-resistant S. epidermidis are among the leading causes of nosocomial infections. The effect of hospitalization and antimicrobial therapy on antimicrobial resistance of colonizing staphylococci was determined from swabs of the nose, hand, axilla and groin from 157 patients on one day. Hospitalization for >72 hours, compared with <72 hours, was associated with a higher percentage of isolates resistant to oxacillin (56% versus 19%), gentamicin (40% versus 15%), trimethoprim (36% versus 17%), clindamycin (56% versus 17%), and fusidic acid (20% versus 4%; p < 0.01 for all), but not to rifampicin (6% versus 1%) or fosfomycin (43% versus 34%, p > 0.05 for both). Concurrent antimicrobial therapy resulted in increased resistance to oxacillin (61% versus 28%), gentamicin (43% versus 20%), and clindamycin (60% versus 26%; p < 0.01 for all), but not to trimethoprim (39% versus 23%), fusidic acid (19% versus 9%), rifampicin (6% versus 3%), or fosfomycin (46% versus 38%, p > 0.05 for all). The increase in resistant isolates was not independent, since hospitalization and antimicrobial therapy were correlated (p < 0.001). After adjustment for potential risk factors such as diabetes mellitus, central venous catheters, and hemodialysis, the odds ratio for oxacillin resistance was 2.8-3.6. None of the risk factors showed statistically significant results, except for the presence of neoplastic disease, which had a significant interaction (P=0.035). The within-subgroup odds ratios for patients with and without neoplasm were 4.2 (95% CI, 2.3-5.7) and 2.1 (95% CI, 0.78-3.12), respectively. These results show that hospitalization for more than three days, with or without antimicrobial therapy, and the presence of neoplastic disease are associated with increased antimicrobial resistance in colonizing S. epidermidis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.