Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15378781›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2004

Detection of anti-Helicobacter pylori antibodies in serum and duodenal fluid in peptic gastroduodenal disease.

Angelo Locatelli, Wilson Roberto Catapani, Claudio Rufino Gomes, Claudilene Battistin Paula Silva, Jaques Waisberg

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Non-invasive diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori infection.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Angelo LocatelliDepartment of Surgery, ABC Faculty of Medicine, Avenida Principe de Gales 821, Santo Andre, São Paulo, 09060-650, Brazil.
Wilson Roberto Catapani
Claudio Rufino Gomes
Claudilene Battistin Paula Silva
Jaques Waisberg
Faculdade de Medicina do ABC · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo study the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) infection through the determination of serum levels of anti-H pylori IgG and IgA antibodies, and the levels of anti-H pylori IgA antibodies in duodenal fluid.

methodsData were collected from 93 patients submitted to upper digestive endoscopy due to dyspeptic symptoms. The patients were either negative (group A) or positive (group B) to H pylori by means of both histological detection and urease tests. Before endoscopy, peripheral blood was collected for the investigation of anti-H pylori IgG and IgA antibodies. To perform the urease test, biopsies were obtained from the gastric antrum. For the histological evaluation, biopsies were collected from the gastric antrum (greater and lesser curvatures) and the gastric body. Following this, duodenal fluid was collected from the first and second portions of the duodenum. For the serological assaying of anti-H pylori IgG and IgA, and anti-H pylori IgA in duodenal fluids, the ELISA method was utilized.

resultsThe concentration of serum IgG showed sensitivity of 64.0%, specificity of 83.7%, positive predictive value of 82.0%, negative predictive value of 66.6% and accuracy of 73.1% for the diagnosis of H pylori infection. For the same purpose, serum IgA showed sensitivity of 72.0%, specificity of 65.9%, positive predictive value of 72.0%, negative predictive value of 67.4% and accuracy of 69.8%. If the serological tests were considered together, i.e. when both were positive or negative, the accuracy was 80.0%, sensitivity was 86.6%, specificity was 74.2%, positive predictive value was 74.2% and negative predictive value was 86.6%. When values obtained in the test for detecting IgA in the duodenal fluid were analyzed, no significant difference (P = 0.43) was observed between the values obtained from patients with or without H pylori infection.

conclusionThe results of serum IgG and IgA tests for H pylori detection when used simultaneously, are more efficient in accuracy, sensitivity and negative predictive value, than those when used alone. The concentration of IgA antibodies in duodenal fluid is not useful in identifying patients with or without H pylori.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntibodies, BacterialDuodenumEndoscopy, GastrointestinalEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleGastric MucosaHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriHumansImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GMaleMiddle AgedAntibodies, BacterialImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin G

Identifiers

PMID15378781
PMCPMC4576260
OpenAlexW1517080273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.