ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2005
NK cell activation and tumor infiltration are involved in the antitumor mechanism of Virulizin.
Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Collagen IV and CXC chemokine-derived antiangiogenic peptides suppress glioma xenograft growth.Anti-cancer drugs · 2012Article
- IL-17E, a proinflammatory cytokine, has antitumor efficacy against several tumor types in vivo.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2010Article
- Virulizin induces production of IL-17E to enhance antitumor activity by recruitment of eosinophils into tumors.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2008Article
- FDG small animal PET permits early detection of malignant cells in a xenograft murine model.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2007Article
- Virulizin, a novel immunotherapy agent, activates NK cells through induction of IL-12 expression in macrophages.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous studies have demonstrated antitumor efficacy of Virulizin in several human tumor xenograft models and a critical role for macrophages in the antitumor mechanism of Virulizin. Although there is growing support for an immune stimulatory mechanism of action for Virulizin, the details remain to be elucidated. The aim of this study was to determine whether infiltration of natural killer (NK) cells into xenografted tumors is altered by Virulizin treatment, and whether such alterations contribute to the antitumor activity of Virulizin. Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated that xenografted tumors from Virulizin-treated mice had an increase in infiltration of F4/80(+) (macrophages) and NK1.1(+) (NK) cells. The increase in NK1.1(+) cell infiltration occurred at an early stage of Virulizin treatment, which correlated with an early sign of apoptosis. In addition, Virulizin resulted in an increase in the number of NK cells in the spleens, and NK cells isolated from the spleen exhibited increased cytotoxicity to tumor cells in vitro. In NK cell-deficient SCID-beige mice, the antitumor activity of Virulizin was compromised, providing additional support to the hypothesis that NK cells are necessary for inhibition of tumor growth by Virulizin. Finally, depletion of macrophages resulted in the loss of Virulizin-induced increase in NK1.1(+) cell infiltration into xenografted tumors, suggesting the involvement of macrophages in NK cell infiltration into tumors. Taken together, these results strongly support a mechanism in which Virulizin stimulates a sustained expansion and infiltration of NK cells and macrophages into tumors with subsequent activation of NK cells that is responsible for the observed antitumor activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.