Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15377556›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of ophthalmology2004

Determinants of patient satisfaction with cataract surgery and length of time on the waiting list.

B L Conner-Spady, S Sanmugasunderam, P Courtright, J J McGurran, T W Noseworthy, Steering Committee of the Western Canada Waiting List Project

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The consequences of waiting for cataract surgery: a systematic review.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2007
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Patient satisfaction in ambulatory cataract surgery : Differences between outpatients in a special surgery or in a hospital].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Impact of clinical and patient-reported outcomes on patient satisfaction with cataract extraction.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2014
    Article
  13. [How much waiting time is acceptable for cataract patients?].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2009
    Article
  14. Waiting for surgery from the patient perspective.Psychology research and behavior management · 2009
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Patient satisfaction with cataract surgery.International archives of medicine · 2008
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

B L Conner-SpadyUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
S Sanmugasunderam
P Courtright
J J McGurran
T W Noseworthy
Steering Committee of the Western Canada Waiting List Project
University of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo assess determinants of patient satisfaction with their waiting time (WT) and cataract surgery outcome.

methodsA prospective cohort of consecutive patients waiting for cataract surgery were assessed by their ophthalmologist. Satisfaction, maximum acceptable waiting time (MAWT), urgency, visual function, visual acuity (VA), and health related quality of life (EQ-5D) were assessed using mailed questionnaires before surgery and 8-10 weeks after surgery. Ordinal logistic regression was used to build explanatory models.

results166 patients (61.9% female, mean age 73.4 years) had a mean WT of 16 weeks. Patients whose actual WT was shorter than their MAWT had greater odds of being satisfied with their WT than those whose WT was longer (adjusted OR 3.86, 95% CI 1.38 to 10.74). Improvement in visual function (OR 3.19, 95% CI 1.78 to 5.73), and VA (OR 4.27, 95% CI 1.70 to 10.68) significantly predicted satisfaction with surgery. Models were adjusted for age and sex.

conclusionPatient perspectives on MAWT and satisfaction with WT are important inputs to the process of determining WT standards for levels of patient priority. Patient expectation of WT may mediate satisfaction with actual WT.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionWaiting ListsAgedCataract ExtractionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTime FactorsVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID15377556
PMCPMC1772334
OpenAlexW2165803598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.