ArticlePediatric surgery international2004
Does postoperative pH monitoring predict complicated gastroesophageal reflux in patients with esophageal atresia?
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term outcomes in newborn surgery.Pediatric surgery international · 2022Review
- Detection of reflux-symptom association in children with esophageal atresia by video-pH-impedance study.World journal of gastroenterology · 2020Article
- How to Care for Patients with EA-TEF: The Known and the Unknown.Current gastroenterology reports · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is common after repair of esophageal atresia with a distal tracheoesophageal fistula (EATOF). In a retrospective study we assessed whether early 18-h pH monitoring can predict the development of EATOF-associated gastroesophageal reflux. During 1980-1997, 90 consecutive patients had primary repair for EATOF. Development of GER was classified as favorable if the patient developed no esophagitis or mild esophagitis and needed no antireflux medication, and as unfavorable if the patient developed moderate or secondary esophagitis or required an antireflux procedure. Patients who developed unfavorable GER outcome before pH monitoring or needed secondary reconstruction or those whose endoscopic follow-up data were insufficient were excluded. Eighteen-hour pH monitoring was considered pathologic if esophageal pH was <4 more than 10% of the recorded time or 5% of the recorded time minus 2 h after each meal, or if there were more than three preprandial reflux periods lasting longer than 5 min. A total of fifty patients were included into the study. pH monitoring was performed at the median age of 9.2 (range 2.5-95.0) months and classified as pathologic in 10 and normal in 40 patients. After a median follow-up of 59 (0.3-217.6) months, nine of 10 (90%) patients with pathologic pH monitoring and five of 40 (12.5%) patients with normal pH monitoring developed unfavorable outcomes ( p<.05). We conclude that early pH monitoring predicts the development of significant GER, but because 12.5% of patients with normal early pH monitoring also developed significant GER, early pH monitoring alone does not rule out the development of significant GER.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.