Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15368124›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2004

cDNA cloning and expression patterns of a peroxiredoxin, a catalase and a glutathione peroxidase from Haemonchus contortus.

N H Bagnall, A C Kotze

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N H BagnallQueensland Bioscience Precinct, CSIRO Livestock Industries, 306 Carmody Rd., QLD 4068 St Lucia, Australia.
A C Kotze
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The range of antioxidant enzyme systems available to Haemonchus contortus for detoxification of hydrogen peroxide was investigated using cDNA cloning of candidate genes. PCR with primers based on conserved amino acid regions and spliced leader sequences was used to obtain full-length sequences for a 2-Cys peroxiredoxin, a catalase, and a selenium-independent glutathione peroxidase, indicating that H. contortus expresses a number of antioxidant systems with the potential to detoxify peroxide (nucleotide sequence data reported in this paper are available in the GenBank, EMBL and DDBJ databases under the accession numbers AY603335, AY603336 and AY603337). Quantitative PCR analysis comparing L3-stage larvae with adult worms showed significantly elevated peroxiredoxin levels in adults, equivalent catalase levels in the two stages, and significantly less glutathione peroxidase in adults, suggesting a significant role for peroxiredoxin in allowing the nematode to detoxify hydrogen peroxide encountered in the parasitic environment. Exposure of L4-stage worms to hydrogen peroxide in vitro (generated using glucose/glucose oxidase) caused no change in mRNA levels for each of the genes, though the exposed worms showed up to eightfold higher catalase activities. The lack of mRNA changes alongside increased catalase enzyme activity indicates that transcript level was not predictive of enzyme activity, suggesting that activity may be regulated in response to oxidative stress by a mechanism other than increased transcription.

Indexed as

Cloning, MolecularGene Expression RegulationOxidative StressAnimalsCatalaseDNA, ComplementaryGlutathioneHaemonchusMolecular Sequence DataPeroxidasesPeroxiredoxinsPolymerase Chain ReactionSequence Analysis, DNACatalaseDNA, ComplementaryGlutathionePeroxidasesPeroxiredoxins

Identifiers

PMID15368124
OpenAlexW2135254675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.