Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15367656›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology2004

Swi1 and Swi3 are components of a replication fork protection complex in fission yeast.

Eishi Noguchi, Chiaki Noguchi, W Hayes McDonald, John R Yates, Paul Russell

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 138 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
138citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

138 citing papers in PubMed, 203 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. The TIMELESS effort for timely DNA replication and protection.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The intra-S phase checkpoint directly regulates replication elongation to preserve the integrity of stalled replisomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

78 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eishi NoguchiDepartment of Molecular Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, USA. Eishi.Noguchi@drexel.edu
Chiaki Noguchi
W Hayes McDonald
John R Yates
Paul Russell
Scripps Research Institute · USInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology · RU

Funding

Studies of the DNA Replication CheckpointR01GM059447 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI RUSSELL, PAUL · 1999 to 2016
$6.0M
PROTEOME ANALYSIS OF NORMAL AND CATARACTOUS LENSESR01EY013288 · NEI · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI YATES, JOHN ROBERT · 2000 to 2003
$1.4M
NEI NIH HHS EY1328801NIGMS NIH HHS GM59447NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059447
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Swi1 is required for programmed pausing of replication forks near the mat1 locus in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. This fork pausing is required to initiate a recombination event that switches mating type. Swi1 is also needed for the replication checkpoint that arrests division in response to fork arrest. How Swi1 accomplishes these tasks is unknown. Here we report that Swi1 copurifies with a 181-amino-acid protein encoded by swi3(+). The Swi1-Swi3 complex is required for survival of fork arrest and for activation of the replication checkpoint kinase Cds1. Association of Swi1 and Swi3 with chromatin during DNA replication correlated with movement of the replication fork. swi1Delta and swi3Delta mutants accumulated Rad22 (Rad52 homolog) DNA repair foci during replication. These foci correlated with the Rad22-dependent appearance of Holliday junction (HJ)-like structures in cells lacking Mus81-Eme1 HJ resolvase. Rhp51 and Rhp54 homologous recombination proteins were not required for viability in swi1Delta or swi3Delta cells, indicating that the HJ-like structures arise from single-strand DNA gaps or rearranged forks instead of broken forks. We propose that Swi1 and Swi3 define a fork protection complex that coordinates leading- and lagging-strand synthesis and stabilizes stalled replication forks.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceCell Cycle ProteinsChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA HelicasesEndonucleasesMolecular Sequence DataNuclear ProteinsRad51 RecombinaseSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSchizosaccharomycesSchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsS PhaseTrans-ActivatorsTranscription FactorsCell Cycle ProteinsChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA HelicasesEndonucleasesMUS81 protein, S cerevisiaeNuclear ProteinsRad51 Recombinaserad52 protein, S pombeRHP51 protein, S pombeRhp54 protein, S pombeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSchizosaccharomyces pombe Proteinsswi1 protein, S pombeSWI3 protein, S cerevisiaeTrans-ActivatorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID15367656
PMCPMC516732
OpenAlexW2171470046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.