Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15367460›Full record

ArticleCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2004

A prospective cohort study of pregnancy risk factors and birth outcomes in Aboriginal women.

Wanda M Wenman, Michel R Joffres, Ivanna V Tataryn, Edmonton Perinatal Infections Group

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Understanding Inequalities of Maternal Smoking--Bridging the Gap with Adapted Intervention Strategies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Revista peruana de medicina experimental y salud publica · 2009
    Article
  18. Prejudice in medicine: Our role in creating health care disparities.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2008
    Article
  19. The ethics of research involving Canada's Aboriginal populations.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2005
    Article
  20. Health outcomes in Aboriginal populations.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2004
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wanda M WenmanProvincial Laboratory of Public Health for Northern Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. wmwenman@ucdavis.edu
Michel R Joffres
Ivanna V Tataryn
Edmonton Perinatal Infections Group

Funding

Using Technology to Enhance Cancer Communication and Improve Clinical OutcomesP50CA095817 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BURNSIDE, ELIZABETH S · 2003 to 2012
$19.3M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA095817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAboriginal women have been identified as having poorer pregnancy outcomes than other Canadian women, but information on risk factors and outcomes has been acquired mostly from retrospective databases. We compared prenatal risk factors and birth outcomes of First Nations and Métis women with those of other participants in a prospective study.

methodsDuring the 12-month period from July 1994 to June 1995, we invited expectant mothers in all obstetric practices affiliated with a single teaching hospital in Edmonton to participate. Women were recruited at their first prenatal visit and followed through delivery. Sociodemographic and clinical data were obtained by means of a patient questionnaire, and microbiological data were collected at 3 points during gestation: in the first and second trimesters and during labour. Our primary outcomes of interest were low birth weight (birth weight less than 2500 g), prematurity (birth at less than 37 weeks' gestation) and macrosomia (birth weight greater than 4000 g).

resultsOf the 2047 women consecutively enrolled, 1811 completed the study through delivery. Aboriginal women accounted for 70 (3.9%) of the subjects who completed the study (45 First Nations women and 25 Métis women). Known risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcome were more common among Aboriginal than among non-Aboriginal women, including previous premature infant (21% v. 11%), smoking during the current pregnancy (41% v. 13%), presence of bacterial vaginosis in midgestation (33% v. 13%) and poor nutrition as measured by meal consumption. Although Aboriginal women were less likely than non-Aboriginal women to have babies of low birth weight (odds ratio [OR] 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-4.15) or who were born prematurely (OR 1.45, 95% CI 0.57-3.72) and more likely to have babies with macrosomia (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.03-4.03), these differences were lower and statistically nonsignificant after adjustment for smoking, cervicovaginal infection and income (adjusted OR for low birth weight 0.85, 95% CI 0.19-3.78; for prematurity 0.90, 95% CI 0.21-3.89; and for macrosomia 2.12, 95% CI 0.84-5.36).

interpretationAfter adjustment for potential confounding factors, we found no statistically significant relation between Aboriginal status and birth outcome.

Indexed as

Indians, North AmericanAdultCanadaDiabetes MellitusFemaleFetal MacrosomiaHumansInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureNutritional StatusPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePrenatal CareProspective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID15367460
PMCPMC516193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.