Trial reportJournal of human hypertension2004
Disparate systemic and renal blocking properties of angiotensin II antagonists during exogenous angiotensin II administration: implications for treatment.
Trial report in Journal of human hypertension, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generation of angiotensin II (Ang II) contributes to the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases. Owing to the existence of high levels of Ang II within the kidney, blockade of the intrarenal Ang II levels may be important since long term outcome seems not only to be related to blood pressure per se. This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, with crossover design. We examined in 13 patients with mild to moderate hypertension the specific systemic and renal blocking properties of two different Ang II receptor blockers during a wide range of Ang II concentrations, 24 h post dose. The effects were evaluated after 4 weeks treatment with candesartan cilexetil (16 mg OD), losartan (50 mg OD) and placebo using clearance techniques. Candesartan reduced the 24 h blood pressure better than losartan (138(*)/87+/-12/8 vs 145/89+/-12/7 mmHg, (*)P<0.05 vs losartan) and placebo. Despite the lower blood pressure, candesartan attenuated the Ang II-induced response on ERPF and RVR markedly better than losartan or placebo. The GFR decreased, as expected, with placebo, but remained stable with candesartan. The present study demonstrates that in hypertensive patients candesartan and to a lesser degree losartan are effective in blocking the systemic and renal effects of Ang II during a wide range of Ang II infusion rates. Interestingly, 24 h post dose, candesartan effectively diminished the change in ERPF as well as GFR. This sustained renal effect of candesartan may be of importance, especially in pathophysiological circumstances in which (high renal levels of) Ang II contributes to cardiovascular damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.