ArticleOncogene2004
The regulation of CHK2 in human cancer.
Article in Oncogene, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Germline variants in DNA repair genes associated with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome: analysis of a 21 gene panel in the Brazilian population.BMC medical genomics · 2020Article
- A new insight into the apoptotic effect of nitidine chloride targeting Checkpoint kinase 2 in human cervical cancerJournal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition · 2019Article
- Analysis of somatic mutations across the kinome reveals loss-of-function mutations in multiple cancer types.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Age- and Tumor Subtype-Specific Breast Cancer Risk Estimates for CHEK2*1100delC Carriers.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2016Article
- The Wip1 phosphatase (PPM1D) antagonizes activation of the Chk2 tumour suppressor kinase.Oncogene · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exceptional progress has been made in the past two decades in mapping oncogenes and tumour suppressors, defining a function for these master switches, and identifying novel anti-cancer drug targets. The p53 tumour suppressor is a central component of a DNA-damage-inducible pathway controlled by the ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and CHK2 protein kinases that have a central role in cancer suppression. One limitation of current human cancer research is the difficulty in developing genetic models that reveal the post-translational regulation of a growth suppressor like CHK2 within the microenvironment of a human tumour. Gaining such insights is important since yeast models and human tissue culture cell lines do not necessarily predict how enzymes like CHK2 are regulated in vivo, and therefore what factors can affect CHK2 tumour suppressor function. Translational cancer research aims to link basic research methodologies and clinical biology by uncovering cancer-specific pathways not revealed by other approaches. This approach is exemplified by two studies in this edition of Oncogene: both use a set of well-characterized human cancers with the objective of identifying novel post-translational control of the tumour suppressor CHK2. The authors have revealed two unexpected epigenetic modifications of the CHK2 pathway in vivo: (1) constitutive phosphorylation of CHK2 at its ATM-activated site in the absence of exogenous DNA damage; and (2) the production of hyper-spliced and inactive isoforms of CHK2. These studies highlight the need to develop model systems to understand why CHK2-activating pathways are being triggered or suppressed in different human cancers and whether the splicing machinery can be manipulated to control the activity of CHK2 for therapeutic benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.