Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15353569›Full record

ReviewMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR2004

Single-cell microbiology: tools, technologies, and applications.

Byron F Brehm-Stecher, Eric A Johnson

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 135 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
135citing papers in PubMed
17.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

135 citing papers in PubMed, 483 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Future Research Directions on Mycobacterium tuberculosis Proteins.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Recent Developments and Applications of Microbial Electrochemical Biosensors.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Analysis ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Glioma Stem Cells: Novel Data Obtained by Single-Cell Sequencing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  20. Rules of Engagement: A Guide to Developing Agent-Based Models.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article

75 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Byron F Brehm-StecherDepartment of Food Microbiology and Toxicology, University of Wisconsin-Madison Food Research Institute, 1925 Willow Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Eric A Johnson
Food Research Institute · SKUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of microbiology has traditionally been concerned with and focused on studies at the population level. Information on how cells respond to their environment, interact with each other, or undergo complex processes such as cellular differentiation or gene expression has been obtained mostly by inference from population-level data. Individual microorganisms, even those in supposedly "clonal" populations, may differ widely from each other in terms of their genetic composition, physiology, biochemistry, or behavior. This genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity has important practical consequences for a number of human interests, including antibiotic or biocide resistance, the productivity and stability of industrial fermentations, the efficacy of food preservatives, and the potential of pathogens to cause disease. New appreciation of the importance of cellular heterogeneity, coupled with recent advances in technology, has driven the development of new tools and techniques for the study of individual microbial cells. Because observations made at the single-cell level are not subject to the "averaging" effects characteristic of bulk-phase, population-level methods, they offer the unique capacity to observe discrete microbiological phenomena unavailable using traditional approaches. As a result, scientists have been able to characterize microorganisms, their activities, and their interactions at unprecedented levels of detail.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriaEukaryotaFlow CytometryFluorescent DyesFungiMicrobiological TechniquesMicroscopyFluorescent Dyes

Identifiers

PMID15353569
PMCPMC515252
OpenAlexW2121901998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.