Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15353564›Full record

ReviewMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR2004

Effects of length and location on the cellular response to double-stranded RNA.

Qiaoqiao Wang, Gordon G Carmichael

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Endogenous Double-Stranded RNA.Non-coding RNA · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Qiaoqiao WangDepartment of Genetics and Developmental Biology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030-3301, USA.
Gordon G Carmichael

Funding

PROCESSING AND FUNCTION OF POLYOMA RNAR01CA045382 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI CARMICHAEL, GORDON G · 1987 to 2015
$4.7M
The Fate of dsRNA in the NucleusR01GM066816 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI CARMICHAEL, GORDON G. · 2003 to 2006
$1.0M
NCI NIH HHS CA45382NCI NIH HHS R01 CA045382NIGMS NIH HHS GM066816NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM066816
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) has not until recently generally been thought to be deliberately expressed in cells, it has commonly been assumed that the major source of cellular dsRNA is viral infections. In this view, the cellular responses to dsRNA would be natural and perhaps ancient antiviral responses. While the cell may certainly react to some dsRNAs as an antiviral response, this does not represent the only response or even, perhaps, the major one. A number of recent observations have pointed to the possibility that dsRNA molecules are not seen only as evidence of viral infection or recognized for degradation because they cannot be translated. In some instances they may also play important roles in normal cell growth and function. The purpose of this review is to outline our current understanding of the fate of dsRNA in cells, with a focus on the apparent fact that their fates and functions appear to depend critically not only on where in the cell dsRNA molecules are found, but also on how long they are and perhaps on how abundant they are.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationAnimalsCell NucleusCytoplasmEukaryotic CellsHumansProteinsRNA, Double-StrandedProteinsRNA, Double-Stranded

Identifiers

PMID15353564
PMCPMC515255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.