Trial reportThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2004
Giving patients an audiotape of their GP consultation: a randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient Understanding of Multiple Myeloma and Communication Experiences (PUMMaCE): Results From a UK Survey.EJHaem · 2026Article
- Providing routine digital recordings of clinic visits to patients: a multiple-case study of three settings in the U.S.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- Provider Perspective on Being Recorded During Emergency Medicine Discharge Conversations.Cureus · 2022Article
- Evaluating and providing quality health information for adolescents and young adults with cancer.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2019Review
- Coaching patients in the use of decision and communication aids: RE-AIM evaluation of a patient support program.BMC health services research · 2015Article
- Health information for patients: time to look beyond patient information leaflets.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2008Article
- Patient-centredness.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2004Article
- The journey towards patient-centredness.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProviding patients with an audiotape of their medical consultation has been a relatively common practice in oncology clinics for some years. However, broader generalisability of the technique has yet to be examined.
aimsTo investigate the efficacy of providing patients with an audiotape of their consultation in a general practice setting. DESIGN OF STUDY: Randomised controlled trial: 95 experimental participants, 85 controls.
settingRoutine surgeries run by two general practitioners (GPs) in two different health centres.
methodAll patients attending GP appointments were eligible for inclusion. Patients were followed up by telephone 7-10 days later.
resultsMore than half (61%) of the patients who received a tape listened to it. Among listeners, 64% rated the tape useful or very useful; 24% noticed information not heard in the consultation. Half of listeners (46%) said that their understanding of the consultation improved after listening to the tape. Half of the listeners (48%) shared the tape with others, of whom 71% found sharing helpful or very helpful. However, 21% of those who shared the information with others found this unhelpful or very unhelpful, suggesting that patients may need to be briefed on the potential risks of sharing. At follow-up a week later, it emerged that being given a tape had no effect on adherence with GPs' advice, nor on anxiety about conditions.
conclusionProviding patients with an audiotape of their GP consultation was positively rated by many patients. Although there were no detectable clinical effects at follow-up, the technique merits further evaluation in general practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15353052PMC1326067W1549306875What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.