Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15353052›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2004

Giving patients an audiotape of their GP consultation: a randomised controlled trial.

Christine Liddell, Gordon Rae, Tom R M Brown, David Johnston, Vivien Coates, John Mallett

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Patient-centredness.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2004
    Article
  8. The journey towards patient-centredness.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2004
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Christine LiddellUniversity of Ulster, Coleraine, Northern Ireland. c.liddell@ulster.ac.uk
Gordon Rae
Tom R M Brown
David Johnston
Vivien Coates
John Mallett
OGT Amenity (Ireland) · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProviding patients with an audiotape of their medical consultation has been a relatively common practice in oncology clinics for some years. However, broader generalisability of the technique has yet to be examined.

aimsTo investigate the efficacy of providing patients with an audiotape of their consultation in a general practice setting. DESIGN OF STUDY: Randomised controlled trial: 95 experimental participants, 85 controls.

settingRoutine surgeries run by two general practitioners (GPs) in two different health centres.

methodAll patients attending GP appointments were eligible for inclusion. Patients were followed up by telephone 7-10 days later.

resultsMore than half (61%) of the patients who received a tape listened to it. Among listeners, 64% rated the tape useful or very useful; 24% noticed information not heard in the consultation. Half of listeners (46%) said that their understanding of the consultation improved after listening to the tape. Half of the listeners (48%) shared the tape with others, of whom 71% found sharing helpful or very helpful. However, 21% of those who shared the information with others found this unhelpful or very unhelpful, suggesting that patients may need to be briefed on the potential risks of sharing. At follow-up a week later, it emerged that being given a tape had no effect on adherence with GPs' advice, nor on anxiety about conditions.

conclusionProviding patients with an audiotape of their GP consultation was positively rated by many patients. Although there were no detectable clinical effects at follow-up, the technique merits further evaluation in general practice.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionPhysician-Patient RelationsTape RecordingAdultAnxietyFamily PracticeFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePatient Compliance

Identifiers

PMID15353052
PMCPMC1326067
OpenAlexW1549306875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.