The journey towards patient-centredness.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Scoping review of patient- and family-oriented outcomes and measures for chronic pediatric disease.BMC pediatrics · 2015
   Article
2. Interpretive medicine: Supporting generalism in a changing primary care world.Occasional paper (Royal College of General Practitioners) · 2010
   Article
3. Association between patients' recommendation of their GP and their evaluation of the GP.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2008
   Article
4. Eliciting patients' concerns.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2004
   Article
5. Patient-centredness.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2004
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Patient-centredness.2004
• Commented on by
  Eliciting patients' concerns.2004
• Comment on
  Giving patients an audiotape of their GP consultation: a randomised controlled trial.2004

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as