ArticleChromosoma2004
The labeling efficiency of human telomeres is increased by double-strand PRINS.
Article in Chromosoma, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Primed in situ labeling technique for subtelomeric rearrangements in 70 children with idiopathic mental retardation.Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Medical sciences = Hua zhong ke ji da xue xue bao. Yi xue Ying De wen ban = Huazhong keji daxue xuebao. Yixue Yingdewen ban · 2011Article
- Chromosome arm-specific long telomeres: a new clonal event in primary chronic myelogenous leukemia cells.Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) · 2011Article
- Individual telomere lengths in chronic myeloid leukemia.Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) · 2009Article
- The telomere length dynamic and methods of its assessment.Journal of cellular and molecular medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Telomeres are composed of tandem repeated sequences, TTAGGG, that can be detected either by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), more efficiently by using a peptide nucleic acid (PNA) probe, or by the primed in situ (PRINS) technique. However, the efficiency of human telomere labeling using PRINS is somewhat lower than the efficiency using PNA-FISH. To solve this problem, we developed a double-strand PRINS technique, which uses two primers, (TTAGGG)(7) and (CCCTAA)(7), to label both forward and reverse telomeric DNA strands. A total of 120 lymphocyte metaphases obtained from three normal adults were scored to evaluate the labeling efficiency based upon the telomere signal frequency present in chromatid ends and chromosome arms. As a comparison, 30 metaphases from the same three individuals were evaluated using PNA-FISH. The average labeling efficiency of PRINS was increased to a level very close to that obtained with PNA-FISH. Therefore, we demonstrated that the low labeling efficiency of human telomeres with regular PRINS was likely caused by uneven annealing of primers at the relatively short human telomere sequences, resulting in some telomere sites with very weak or absent labeling. We suggest that the present double-strand labeling protocol is critical to maximize the labeling efficiency of the human telomere sequence when using the PRINS technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15349787What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.