Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15349769›Full record

ArticleHuman genetics2004

Positive selection in MAOA gene is human exclusive: determination of the putative amino acid change selected in the human lineage.

Aida M Andrés, Marta Soldevila, Arcadi Navarro, Kenneth K Kidd, Baldomero Oliva, Jaume Bertranpetit

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Human genetics, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The coevolution of cooperation and cognition in humans.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Genome-wide scans for footprints of natural selection.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2010
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Genetic basis of human brain evolution.Trends in neurosciences · 2008
    Review
  9. Built-in loops allow versatility in domain-domain interactions: lessons from self-interacting domains.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008
    Article
  10. Adaptive evolution of genes underlying schizophrenia.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2007
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. New insights into the structures and functions of human monoamine oxidases A and B.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2007
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Three-dimensional structure of human monoamine oxidase A (MAO A): relation to the structures of rat MAO A and human MAO B.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2005
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Aida M AndrésUnitat de Biologia Evolutiva, Departament de Ciències Experimentals i de la Salut, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Marta Soldevila
Arcadi Navarro
Kenneth K Kidd
Baldomero Oliva
Jaume Bertranpetit
Pompeu Fabra University · ESCornell University · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monoamine oxidase A (MAOA) is the X-linked gene responsible for deamination and subsequent degradation of several neurotransmitters and other amines. Among other activities, the gene has been shown to play a role in locomotion, circadian rhythm, and pain sensitivity and to have a critical influence on behavior and cognition. Previous studies have reported a non-neutral evolution of the gene attributable to positive selection in the human lineage. To determine whether this selection was human-exclusive or shared with other species, we performed a population genetic analysis of the pattern of nucleotide variation in non-human species, including bonobo, chimpanzee, gorilla, and orangutan. Footprints of positive selection were absent in all analyzed species, suggesting that positive selection has been recent and unique to humans. To determine which human-unique genetic changes could have been responsible for this differential evolution, the coding region of the gene was compared between human, chimpanzee, and gorilla. Only one human exclusive non-conservative change is present in the gene: Glu151Lys. This human substitution affects protein dimerization according to a three-dimensional structural model that predicts a non-negligible functional shift. This is the only candidate position at present to have been selected to fixation in humans during an episode of positive selection. Divergence analysis among species has shown that, even under positive selection in the human lineage, the MAOA gene did not experience accelerated evolution in any of the analyzed lineages, and that tools such as K(a)/ K(s) would not have detected the selective history of the gene.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularPhylogenySelection, GeneticAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsGorilla gorillaHumansModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataMonoamine OxidasePan paniscusPan troglodytesPongo pygmaeusPopulation SurveillanceMonoamine Oxidase

Identifiers

PMID15349769
OpenAlexW2170813264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.