Adhesion of thermally sprayed hydroxyapatite-bond-coat systems measured by a novel peel test.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Analytical Techniques for the Characterization of Bioactive Coatings for Orthopaedic Implants.Biomedicines · 2021
   Review
2. Enhanced osteointegration of orthopaedic implant gradient coating composed of bioactive glass and nanohydroxyapatite.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2010
   Article
3. In vitro and in vivo performance of Ti6Al4V implants with plasma-sprayed osteoconductive hydroxylapatite-bioinert titania bond coat "duplex" systems: an experimental study in sheep.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2004
   Article
4. An improved peel test method for measurement of adhesion to biomaterials.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2000
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract