ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2002
In vitro response of primary rat osteoblasts to titania/hydroxyapatite coatings compared with transformed human osteoblast-like cells.
Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Fluoridated hydroxyapatite/titanium dioxide nanocomposite coating fabricated by a modified electrochemical deposition.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2009Article
- Nanotechnology, nanotoxicology, and neuroscience.Progress in neurobiology · 2009Review
- Biological behavior of sol-gel coated dental implants.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The biocompatibility of titania/hydroxyapatite (TiO(2)HA) composite coatings, at different ratio obtained by sol-gel process, was investigated studying the behavior of primary cultures of rat osteoblastic cells, isolated by femoral trabecular bone tissue. Moreover, the results have been compared with the response of human osteoblast-like MG63 cell line. Cytotoxicity of coatings was assessed by lactate dehydrogenase activity (LDH). The cellular behavior was analyzed by the cell proliferation (MTT test), cell morphology (SEM) and the biochemical markers evaluation of osteoblastic phenotype, such as alkaline phosphatase activity (ALP) and osteocalcin production. The results showed that TiO(2)/HA coatings have no toxic effects and seemed to be a good support for cell adhesion and proliferation. Moreover, these materials allowed the differentiation of osteoblasts, stimulating the expression of alkaline phosphatase activity. The responses of the primary rat osteoblasts and human osteoblast-like MG63 cell line grown onto these coatings were similar in terms of proliferation and ALP activity. Differences were found considering the osteocalcin production. The results show that these coatings, thanks to their chemical composition and the deposition technique, are very promising for the potential orthopedic and dental applications.
Identifiers
15348568What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.