ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2003
Evaluation of the potential of starch-based biodegradable polymers in the activation of human inflammatory cells.
Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Influence of porosity and fibre diameter on the degradation of chitosan fibre-mesh scaffolds and cell adhesion.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2007Article
- The effect of starch-based biomaterials on leukocyte adhesion and activation in vitro.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The inflammatory response resulting from the implantation of a medical device may compromise its performance and efficiency leading, in certain cases, to the failure of the implant. Thus, the assessment of the behavior of inflammatory cells in vitro, constitutes a key feature in the evaluation of the adverse potential, or not, of new promising biomaterials. The objectives of this study were to determine whether starch-based polymers and composites activated human neutrophils. Blends of starch with ethylene-vinyl alcohol, with cellulose acetate and polycaprolactone, as well as composites based on all these materials filled with hydroxyapatite have been studied. A lysozyme assay was adapted to examine enzyme secretion from human neutrophils incubated with different starch-based materials. Changes in the free radical and degranulation activity of the neutrophil were also determined by measuring the luminescent response of Pholasin, a photoprotein that emits light after excitation by reactive oxygen species. The amount of lysozyme secreted by neutrophils incubated with the polymers did not exhibit significant differences between the tested materials. Results were in all cases similar to those obtained for the control (polypropylene) except for one of the starch blends (corn starch with polycaprolactone reinforced with 30% (w/w) of HA). The chemiluminescence experiments showed that polymers reduce the signal produced by activated neutrophils. Furthermore, for some polymers it was demonstrated that the phenomenon was due to an effect of the surface of the materials in cell adhesion or a simultaneous competition for the photoprotein in solution, which results in the decrease of the intensity of light emitted and detected.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.