ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine
Calcification and identification of metalloproteinases in bovine pericardium after subcutaneous implantation in rats.
Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of current biologic meshes in pelvic organ prolapse repair.Current urology reports · 2012Review
- Current usage and future directions for the bovine pericardial patch.Annals of vascular surgery · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of two anticalcification pre-treatments (chloroform/methanol and ethanol) and serum conditioning of glutaraldehyde-crosslinked bovine pericardium on the calcification degree and the presence of gelatinase activities in a subcutaneous implantation model in rats. Regarding calcification of the implants, glutaraldehyde control treatments showed a significatively higher calcification degree than pericardium treated with anticalcification reagents. Serum conditioning of glutaraldehyde treated tissues did not influence the calcification degree; moreover, no differences were found in these samples with the time of implantation (30 and 90 days). On the other hand, anticalcification treatments resulted in a very significant decrease in the calcium content in the implanted membranes. Gelatinase activities were detected by gelatin zymography in almost all the implanted samples. However, control tissues with and without serum conditioning showed less gelatinase activities than those samples pre-treated with anticalcification treatments. Metalloproteinase (MMP-2) activity was detected in all the samples analyzed but a higher expression of MMP-9 was detected in those implants treated with chloroform/methanol and ethanol. Additional gelatinase activities showing lower molecular weight than MMP-2 were also detected in both anticalcification treated samples. The presence of these gelatinase activities is probably due to host cellular infiltrates and could contribute to the biomaterial degradation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.