Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15345600›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2004

Re-engineering systems for the treatment of depression in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial.

Allen J Dietrich, Thomas E Oxman, John W Williams, Herbert C Schulberg, Martha L Bruce, Pamela W Lee, Sheila Barry, Patrick J Raue, Jean J Lefever, Moonseong Heo and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01583400 (Development and Evaluation of Enhanced Digital Health Coaching Program for Depressive Symptoms to Support Collaborative Depression Treatment in Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 100 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01583400 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2011, after this paper: background citation

Development and Evaluation of Enhanced Digital Health Coaching Program for Depressive Symptoms to Support Collaborative Depression Treatment in Primary Care: The RESPECT-D-E (Enhanced) Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterRan2011 to 2013Enrolled131ConditionsDepressive Disorder, Major, Depressive Disorder, Minor, Dysthymic DisorderArmsRESPECT-D, RESPECT-D-E (Enhanced)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Consultation liaison in primary care for people with mental disorders.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Screening and case-finding instruments for depression: a meta-analysis.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2008
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. The effect of telephone-facilitated depression care on older, medically ill patients.The journal of behavioral health services & research · 2014
    Trial
  13. Longitudinal relationships between fatigue and depression in cancer patients with depression and/or pain.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2013
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Allen J DietrichDartmouth Medical School, HB 7250, Hanover, NH 03755, USA. allen.j.dietrich@dartmouth.edu
Thomas E Oxman
John W Williams
Herbert C Schulberg
Martha L Bruce
Pamela W Lee
Sheila Barry
Patrick J Raue
Jean J Lefever
Moonseong Heo
Kathryn Rost
Kurt Kroenke
Martha Gerrity
Paul A Nutting

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo test the effectiveness of an evidence based model for management of depression in primary care with support from quality improvement resources.

designCluster randomised controlled trial.

settingFive healthcare organisations in the United States and 60 affiliated practices. PATIENTS: 405 patients, aged > or = 18 years, starting or changing treatment for depression.

interventionCare provided by clinicians, with staff providing telephone support under supervision from a psychiatrist.

main outcome measuresSeverity of depression at three and six months (Hopkins symptom checklist-20): response to treatment (> or = 50% decrease in scores) and remission (score of < 0.5).

resultsAt six months, 60% (106 of 177) of patients in intervention practices had responded to treatment compared with 47% (68 of 146) of patients in usual care practices (P = 0.02). At six months, 37% of intervention patients showed remission compared with 27% for usual care patients (P = 0.014). 90% of intervention patients rated their depression care as good or excellent at six months compared with 75% of usual care patients (P = 0.0003).

conclusionResources such as quality improvement programmes can be used effectively in primary care to implement evidence based management of depression and improve outcomes for patients with depression.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCluster AnalysisCommunity Mental Health ServicesDepressive DisorderFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareRemote ConsultationSocial SupportTelephoneUnited States

Identifiers

PMID15345600
PMCPMC516659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.