Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15345569›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2004

The role of electrostatic interactions in calmodulin-peptide complex formation.

Ingemar André, Tõnu Kesvatera, Bo Jönsson, Karin S Akerfeldt, Sara Linse

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Local and global anatomy of antibody-protein antigen recognition.Journal of molecular recognition : JMR · 2018
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Ingemar AndréDepartment of Biophysical Chemistry, Lund University, Chemical Center, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden. ingemar.andre@bpc.lu.se
Tõnu Kesvatera
Bo Jönsson
Karin S Akerfeldt
Sara Linse
Lund University · SEHaverford College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The complex between calmodulin and the calmodulin-binding portion of smMLCKp has been studied. Electrostatic interactions have been anticipated to be important in this system where a strongly negative protein binds a peptide with high positive charge. Electrostatic interactions were probed by varying the pH in the range from 4 to 11 and by charge deletions in CaM and smMLCKp. The change in net charge of CaM from approximately -5 at pH 4.5 to -15 at pH 7.5 leaves the binding constant virtually unchanged. The affinity was also unaffected by mutations in CaM and charge substitutions in the peptide. The insensitivity of the binding constant to pH may seem surprising, but it is a consequence of the high charge on both protein and peptide. At low pH it is further attenuated by a charge regulation mechanism. That is, the protein releases a number of protons when binding the positively charged peptide. We speculate that the role of electrostatic interactions is to discriminate against unbound proteins rather than to increase the affinity for any particular target protein.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsCalciumCalmodulinEscherichia coliHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationIonsLigandsModels, MolecularModels, StatisticalMolecular Sequence DataMonte Carlo MethodMutationPeptidesProtein BindingProteinsCalciumCalmodulinIonsLigandsPeptidesProteins

Identifiers

PMID15345569
PMCPMC1304596
OpenAlexW2120029297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.