Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15345525›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2004

Probing protein mechanics: residue-level properties and their use in defining domains.

Isabelle Navizet, Fabien Cailliez, Richard Lavery

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Anisotropic deformation response of single protein molecules.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2006
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Isabelle NavizetLaboratoire de Biochimie Théorique, UPR 9080 CNRS, Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique, Paris 75005, France.
Fabien Cailliez
Richard Lavery

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is becoming clear that, in addition to structural properties, the mechanical properties of proteins can play an important role in their biological activity. It nevertheless remains difficult to probe these properties experimentally. Whereas single-molecule experiments give access to overall mechanical behavior, notably the impact of end-to-end stretching, it is currently impossible to directly obtain data on more local properties. We propose a theoretical method for probing the mechanical properties of protein structures at the single-amino acid level. This approach can be applied to both all-atom and simplified protein representations. The probing leads to force constants for local deformations and to deformation vectors indicating the paths of least mechanical resistance. It also reveals the mechanical coupling that exists between residues. Results obtained for a variety of proteins show that the calculated force constants vary over a wide range. An analysis of the induced deformations provides information that is distinct from that obtained with measures of atomic fluctuations and is more easily linked to residue-level properties than normal mode analyses or dynamic trajectories. It is also shown that the mechanical information obtained by residue-level probing opens a new route for defining so-called dynamical domains within protein structures.

Indexed as

BiophysicsCalmodulinComputer SimulationDatabases as TopicHydrogenMicrococcal NucleaseModels, MolecularModels, StatisticalProtein ConformationProteinsProtein Structure, SecondaryProtein Structure, TertiarySoftwareTemperatureCalmodulinHydrogenMicrococcal NucleaseProteins

Identifiers

PMID15345525
PMCPMC1304551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.