Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15345032›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2004

Automatic annotation of protein motif function with Gene Ontology terms.

Xinghua Lu, Chengxiang Zhai, Vanathi Gopalakrishnan, Bruce G Buchanan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Biomedical text mining and its applications.PLoS computational biology · 2009
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xinghua LuDept. of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Epidemiology, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Cannon St, Suite 303, Charleston, SC 29425, USA. lux@musc.edu
Chengxiang Zhai
Vanathi Gopalakrishnan
Bruce G Buchanan

Funding

The internship in Biomedical Research, Informatics, and Computer Science (iBRIC): Biomedical Informatics and Data Science research experiences for students from Minority Serving InstitutionsT15LM007059 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HARRY S HOCHHEISER · 1987 to 2026
$23.9M
DATA MINING AND MODEL BUILDING IN MEDICAL INFORMATICSR01LM006759 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BUCHANAN, BRUCE G · 1999 to 2001
$429k
NLM NIH HHS 3 T15 LM07059-15SINLM NIH HHS 5 T15 LM07059-15NLM NIH HHS LM06759NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConserved protein sequence motifs are short stretches of amino acid sequence patterns that potentially encode the function of proteins. Several sequence pattern searching algorithms and programs exist foridentifying candidate protein motifs at the whole genome level. However, a much needed and important task is to determine the functions of the newly identified protein motifs. The Gene Ontology (GO) project is an endeavor to annotate the function of genes or protein sequences with terms from a dynamic, controlled vocabulary and these annotations serve well as a knowledge base.

resultsThis paper presents methods to mine the GO knowledge base and use the association between the GO terms assigned to a sequence and the motifs matched by the same sequence as evidence for predicting the functions of novel protein motifs automatically. The task of assigning GO terms to protein motifs is viewed as both a binary classification and information retrieval problem, where PROSITE motifs are used as samples for mode training and functional prediction. The mutual information of a motif and aGO term association is found to be a very useful feature. We take advantage of the known motifs to train a logistic regression classifier, which allows us to combine mutual information with other frequency-based features and obtain a probability of correct association. The trained logistic regression model has intuitively meaningful and logically plausible parameter values, and performs very well empirically according to our evaluation criteria.

conclusionsIn this research, different methods for automatic annotation of protein motifs have been investigated. Empirical result demonstrated that the methods have a great potential for detecting and augmenting information about the functions of newly discovered candidate protein motifs.

Indexed as

Amino Acid MotifsComputational BiologyConserved SequenceDatabases, ProteinGenesLogistic ModelsPredictive Value of TestsProteinsSensitivity and SpecificityProteins

Identifiers

PMID15345032
PMCPMC517493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.