ArticleEcotoxicology (London, England)2004
Assessment of sediment ecotoxicity and genotoxicity in freshwater laboratory microcosms.
Article in Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Organic carbon source in formulated sediments influences life traits and gene expression of Caenorhabditis elegans.Ecotoxicology (London, England) · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One possible fate of dredged sediments is disposal in a submerged gravel pit, but this practice may be a source of contamination of the aquatic environment. In an attempt to assess the risks for the aquatic ecosystem, a microcosm test was conducted in the laboratory on three sediments of channel sections to be dredged. After a 3-day period of stabilization, pelagic organisms (microalgae, daphnids, duckweeds, pond snails) and benthic organisms (amphipods, chironomids) were introduced into microcosms. Survival and growth of organisms were monitored during 28 days. Genetic damage was measured weekly in pond snail hemocytes through the comet assay. The sediments contained high levels of metals (up to 740 mg copper/kg and 1220 mg zinc/kg), but were moderately contaminated by PAHs (total PAH content < 10 mg/kg) and PCBs (total PCB content < 0.6 mg/kg). Only moderate effects on the biota were observed, except for genetic damage on pond snail hemocytes which was significant in all microcosms. The absence of pronounced toxic effects on organisms was not expected since concentrations of some sediment toxicants were above threshold values reported in the literature, especially for metals in two sediments, and for PAHs in the three sediments. Speciation, influence of organic matter and presence of sulfides might explain the low toxicity observed. By contrast, assessment of DNA damage revealed to be more sensitive and enabled a ranking of sediments coherent with their toxic load. In the present work, the microcosm protocol previously set up with a formulated sediment appears to be fitted to natural sediments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.