Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15343351›Full record

Trial reportJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2005

Can oral sucrose reduce the pain and distress associated with screening for retinopathy of prematurity?

Joanna Grabska, Peter Walden, Trudy Lerer, Christopher Kelly, Naveed Hussain, Terese Donovan, Victor Herson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. New Directions for Ophthalmic OCT - Handhelds, Surgery, and Robotics.Translational vision science & technology · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Reducing discomfort of eye drops prior to retinal examination in the neonatal intensive care unit.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Differential effects of the retinopathy of prematurity exam on the physiology of premature infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2019
    Article
  18. Observational
  19. Comparison of strategies for grading retinal images of premature infants for referral warranted retinopathy of prematurity.Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Joanna GrabskaTrinity Collge, Hartford, CT, USA.
Peter Walden
Trudy Lerer
Christopher Kelly
Naveed Hussain
Terese Donovan
Victor Herson
Connecticut Children's Medical Center · USUConn Health · USTrinity College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveInfants undergoing eye exams to screen for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) demonstrate physiologic and behavioral manifestations of pain and distress. Oral sucrose has analgesic properties that might reduce these effects.

aimTo determine the efficacy of oral sucrose in reducing the pain/distress of eye exams for ROP.

methodsA total of 32 infants about to undergo ROP screening exams received either oral sucrose [S] (N=16) or sterile water [C] (N=16) in a randomized, prospective and blinded fashion. Outcome measures included HR, RR, O(2) saturation, BP, pain (premature infant pain profile) and percent of time spent crying during the eye exam.

resultsThe groups were similar in GA (weeks) (28+/-1.6), BW (kg) (1.04+/-0.26), postnatal age (days) 50.8+/-20.3, and study weight (kg) 1.88+/-0.40). Both groups demonstrated significant increases in HR, BP, and pain score in response to the exam. Infants in both groups spent the majority of time actively crying during the exam ([S] 53+/-35% vs [C] 63+/-31%. Infants receiving [S] showed a small but significant drop in O(2) saturation. No significant differences were seen between groups in physiologic or behavioral responses to the eye exam.

conclusionOral [S] was not effective in reducing pain/distress from the ROP screening exam. Alternative strategies should be considered to achieve adequate pain relief.

Indexed as

Administration, OralBlood PressureCryingDiagnostic Techniques, OphthalmologicalDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHeart RateHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMaleNeonatal ScreeningPainPain MeasurementProspective StudiesRespiratory Function TestsSucroseSweetening Agents

Identifiers

PMID15343351
OpenAlexW2062491901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.