Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15342561›Full record

ArticleGenome research2004

De novo repeat classification and fragment assembly.

Pavel A Pevzner, Paul A Pevzner, Haixu Tang, Glenn Tesler

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 84 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Phased Genome Assemblies.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. KOMB: K-core based de novo characterization of copy number variation in microbiomes.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Haploflow: Strain-resolvedbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2021
    Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Pevzner, Paul A [corrected to Pevzner, Pavel A]
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pavel A PevznerDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA.
Paul A Pevzner
Haixu Tang
Glenn Tesler

Funding

A New Approach to Fragment Assembly in DNA SequencingR01HG002366 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO · PI PEVZNER, PAVEL A · 2001 to 2003
$2.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS 1 R01 HG02366NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repetitive sequences make up a significant fraction of almost any genome, and an important and still open question in bioinformatics is how to represent all repeats in DNA sequences. We propose a new approach to repeat classification that represents all repeats in a genome as a mosaic of sub-repeats. Our key algorithmic idea also leads to new approaches to multiple alignment and fragment assembly. In particular, we show that our FragmentGluer assembler improves on Phrap and ARACHNE in assembly of BACs and bacterial genomes.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGenome, HumanChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyContig MappingGenetic LinkageHumansMultigene FamilyRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidSequence Alignment

Identifiers

PMID15342561
PMCPMC515325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.