Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15340056›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology2004

Different effects of CSA and CSB deficiency on sensitivity to oxidative DNA damage.

Harm de Waard, Jan de Wit, Jaan-Olle Andressoo, Conny T M van Oostrom, Bente Riis, Allan Weimann, Henrik E Poulsen, Harry van Steeg, Jan H J Hoeijmakers, Gijsbertus T J van der Horst

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Comparative study of cytotoxic effects induced by environmental genotoxins using XPC- and CSB-deficient human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2019
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Oxidative DNA damage and nucleotide excision repair.Antioxidants & redox signaling · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Harm de WaardMGC, Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, Erasmus Medical Center, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan de Wit
Jaan-Olle Andressoo
Conny T M van Oostrom
Bente Riis
Allan Weimann
Henrik E Poulsen
Harry van Steeg
Jan H J Hoeijmakers
Gijsbertus T J van der Horst
Rigshospitalet · DKNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NL

Funding

THE IMPACT OF CELLULAR DEFENSE ON THE ROLE OF Ku80 IN GENOME MAINTENANCE AND LONGP01AG017242 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR SAN ANT · PI VIJG, JAN · 1999 to 2023
$46.1M
NIA NIH HHS AG17242-02NIA NIH HHS P01 AG017242NIEHS NIH HHS RFA-ES-00-005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutations in the CSA and CSB genes cause Cockayne syndrome, a rare inherited disorder characterized by UV sensitivity, severe neurological abnormalities, and progeriod symptoms. Both gene products function in the transcription-coupled repair (TCR) subpathway of nucleotide excision repair (NER), providing the cell with a mechanism to remove transcription-blocking lesions from the transcribed strands of actively transcribed genes. Besides a function in TCR of NER lesions, a role of CSB in (transcription-coupled) repair of oxidative DNA damage has been suggested. In this study we used mouse models to compare the effect of a CSA or a CSB defect on oxidative DNA damage sensitivity at the levels of the cell and the intact organism. In contrast to CSB(-/-) mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), CSA(-/-) MEFs are not hypersensitive to gamma-ray or paraquat treatment. Similar results were obtained for keratinocytes. In contrast, both CSB(-/-) and CSA(-/-) embryonic stem cells show slight gamma-ray sensitivity. Finally, CSB(-/-) but not CSA(-/-) mice fed with food containing di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (causing elevated levels of oxidative DNA damage in the liver) show weight reduction. These findings not only uncover a clear difference in oxidative DNA damage sensitivity between CSA- and CSB-deficient cell lines and mice but also show that sensitivity to oxidative DNA damage is not a uniform characteristic of Cockayne syndrome. This difference in the DNA damage response between CSA- and CSB-deficient cells is unexpected, since until now no consistent differences between CSA and CSB patients have been reported. We suggest that the CSA and CSB proteins in part perform separate roles in different DNA damage response pathways.

Indexed as

DNA DamageAnimalsCell LineCockayne SyndromeDiethylhexyl PhthalateDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA HelicasesDNA Repair EnzymesDrug ResistanceGamma RaysHumansMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutOxidative StressParaquatCkn1 protein, mouseDiethylhexyl PhthalateDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA HelicasesDNA Repair EnzymesERCC6 protein, humanErcc6 protein, mouseERCC8 protein, humanParaquatPoly-ADP-Ribose Binding ProteinsProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID15340056
PMCPMC515046
OpenAlexW2142777821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.