ArticleBiophysical journal2004
Computational analysis of DNA gyrase action.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
DNA gyrase introduces negative supercoiling into circular DNA by catalyzing the passage of one DNA segment through another. The efficiency of the reaction is many times higher than that of other topological transformations. We analyze, by a computer simulation, the reaction selectivity for a model of DNA gyrase action that assumes existence of a free loop between the G- and T- DNA segments participating in the reaction. A popular model of this type assumed that the selectivity can be provided by the conformation of the DNA segment wrapped around the enzyme into the right-handed helix turn (G-segment). We simulated the distribution of the reaction products for this model. Equilibrium sets of DNA conformations with one segment of the double helix wrapped around the enzyme were constructed. From these sets we selected conformations that had a second segment properly juxtaposed with the first one. Assuming that the juxtapositions result in the strand-passing reaction, we calculated the reaction products for all these conformations. The results show that different products have to be formed if the enzyme acts according to the model. This conclusion can be extended for any model with a free loop between the G- and T-segments. An alternative model that is consistent with the major experimental observations and the computational analysis, is suggested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.