Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15338278›Full record

ArticleHuman genetics2004

A longitudinal study of X-inactivation ratio in human females.

Ionel Sandovici, Anna K Naumova, Mark Leppert, Yendi Linares, Carmen Sapienza

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Human genetics, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. X-chromosome inactivation patterns depend on age and tissue but not conception method in humans.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2023
    Article
  3. Use of theGenes · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Dosage Compensation in Females with X-Linked Metabolic Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Skewed X-inactivation is common in the general female population.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Sexual dimorphism in autoimmunity.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2015
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Ionel SandoviciFels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Biology, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
Anna K Naumova
Mark Leppert
Yendi Linares
Carmen Sapienza
Babraham Institute · GBPhillips Academy · USRoyal Victoria Hospital · CATemple College · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

VIRAL DAMAGE TO BRAIN AND NEUROMUSCULAR SYSTEMM01RR000064 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI SWOBODA, KATHRYN J. · 1985 to 2008
$21.7M
Defining factors causing genome imprint variabilityR21ES011607 · NIEHS · TEMPLE UNIVERSITY · PI SAPIENZA, CARMEN · 2002 to 2003
$301k
NCRR NIH HHS M01-RR00064NIEHS NIH HHS R21ES/CA11607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated the effect of aging on X chromosome inactivation by performing a longitudinal study in a population of 178 normal females. We examined X-inactivation ratios (fraction of cells with the same X chromosome active) in two sets of peripheral blood DNA samples collected about two decades apart. We observed a strong correlation between the ratios of individual females at the two time points and found no significant difference between the two sets of measurements. These observations indicate that aging, per se (as opposed to being "aged"), has little effect on X-inactivation. However, we also found that several females who were older than 60 years of age at the time of the first measurement acquired significant changes in the X-inactivation ratio. We speculate that, if X-inactivation skewing is a frequently acquired trait in older females, it is acquired as the result of a discontinuous or catastrophic process and is not the result of constant selection for or against hematopoietic stem cells with a particular X chromosome active.

Indexed as

AgingDosage Compensation, GeneticAdolescentAgedChildFemaleGenetic LinkageHematopoietic Stem CellsHumansLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedModels, GeneticSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID15338278
OpenAlexW2042978517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.