Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15333882›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2004

The economic burden of smoking in California.

W Max, D P Rice, H-Y Sung, X Zhang, L Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Recreational tobacco consumption and food insecurity among First Nations in Canada.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Economic Burden of Smoking in Iran: A Prevalence-Based Annual Cost ApproachAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Health care expenditures attributable to smoking in military veterans.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2015
    Article
  15. Review
  16. The burden of smoking in Israel-attributable mortality and costs (2014).Israel journal of health policy research · 2014
    Article
  17. Impact of cigarette smoking on utilization of nursing home services.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2013
    Article
  18. Costs of smoking and policy strategies for California American Indian communities.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2012
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

W MaxInstitute for Health & Aging, University of California, San Francisco, 3333 California Street, Suite 340, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA. wmax@itsa.ucsf.edu
D P Rice
H-Y Sung
X Zhang
L Miller

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop estimates of the direct and indirect costs of smoking for California in 1999.

methodsA prevalence based approach was used to estimate the annual costs of smoking. Econometric models were used to estimate the smoking attributable fraction (SAF) for direct costs (hospitalisations, ambulatory care, prescription drugs, home health care, and nursing home services) and indirect costs due to lost productivity from smoking related illness. The models controlled for socioeconomic factors and other risk behaviours. Epidemiological methods were used to estimate the SAF for indirect costs due to lost productivity from premature deaths. The SAFs were applied to total health care expenditures, days lost, and deaths to obtain smoking attributable total costs.

resultsIn 1999, the total costs of smoking in California were 15.9 billion dollars, 475 dollars per resident, and 3331 dollars per smoker. Direct costs were 8.6 billion dollars (54% of the total), indirect costs due to lost productivity from illness were 1.5 billion dollars (10%), and indirect costs due to premature deaths were 5.7 billion dollars (36%). The cost of smoking was 9.4 billion dollars for men and 6.3 billion dollars for women. There were 43,137 deaths attributed to smoking, representing a total of 535,000 years of life lost. The value of life lost per death averaged 132,000 dollars, or 12.4 years.

conclusionsCalifornia smoking related costs are high. The cost methodology presented is useful for other states and nations interested in estimating their costs of smoking. Cost estimates can be used to evaluate the level of cigarette taxes and other policies related to smoking.

Indexed as

AbsenteeismAmbulatory CareCaliforniaCost of IllnessDirect Service CostsEfficiencyFemaleHospitalizationHumansLife ExpectancyMaleSex FactorsSmoking

Identifiers

PMID15333882
PMCPMC1747911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.