Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15333324›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2004

Long-term ethylene oxide exposure trends in US hospitals: relationship with OSHA regulatory and enforcement actions.

Anthony D LaMontagne, J Michael Oakes, Ruth N Lopez Turley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions to prevent injuries in construction workers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anthony D LaMontagneCentre for the Study of Health and Society, Department of Public Health, School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. alamonta@unimelb.edu.au
J Michael Oakes
Ruth N Lopez Turley

Funding

EVALUATING EXPOSURES UNDER OSHAS 1984 ETO STANDARDR01OH003932 · OH · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI HERRICK, ROBERT F · 1999 to 2001
–
NIOSH CDC HHS R01 OH003932NIOSH CDC HHS R01 OH03932
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe assessed long-term trends in ethylene oxide (EtO) worker exposures for the purposes of exposure surveillance and evaluation of the impacts of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) 1984 and 1988 EtO standards.

methodsWe obtained exposure data from a large commercial vendor and processor of EtO passive dosimeters. Personal samples (87,582 workshift [8-hr] and 46,097 short-term [15-min] samples) from 2265 US hospitals were analyzed for time trends from 1984 through 2001 and compared with OSHA enforcement data.

resultsExposures declined steadily for the first several years after the OSHA standards were set. Workshift exposures continued to taper off and have remained low and constant through 2001. However, since 1996, the probability of exceeding the short-term excursion limit has increased. This trend coincides with a decline in enforcement of the EtO standard.

conclusionsResults indicate the need for renewed intervention efforts to preserve gains made following the passage and implementation of the 1984 and 1988 EtO standards.

Indexed as

Occupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureCentral Supply, HospitalDisinfectantsEnvironmental MonitoringEpidemiological MonitoringEthylene OxideFacility Regulation and ControlHousekeeping, HospitalHumansOccupational HealthSafety ManagementUnited StatesUnited States Occupational Safety and Health AdministrationDisinfectantsEthylene Oxide

Identifiers

PMID15333324
PMCPMC1448503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.