Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15331483›Full record

ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2004

Use of decision aids to support informed choices about screening.

Alexandra Barratt, Lyndal Trevena, Heather M Davey, Kirsten McCaffery

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02093039 (Informed Decision Users of the Health System and Participation in Organized Screening for Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02093039 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2009, after this paper: background citation

Informed Decision Users of the Health System and Participation in Organized Screening for Breast Cancer : a Qualitative Analysis

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut de Cancérologie de la LoireRan2009 to 2010Enrolled16,000ConditionsHealthy, Breast CancerArmsdecision aid group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Skeptical reactions to breast cancer screening benefits and harms: Antecedents, consequences, and implications for screening communication.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2025
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexandra BarrattScreening and Test Evaluation Program, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. alexb@health.usyd.edu.au
Lyndal Trevena
Heather M Davey
Kirsten McCaffery

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorDecision Support TechniquesEvidence-Based MedicineHumansMass ScreeningPatientsPrognosisHealth Care and Public Health

Identifiers

PMID15331483
PMCPMC515211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.