ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2004
Using administrative healthcare data to recruit study subjects: experience with 'camouflaged sampling'.
Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo recruit a sample of asthmatics heterogeneous for short-acting (SA) beta-agonist use while protecting their privacy, and to compare participants recruited via 'camouflaged sampling' to those recruited through media advertising.
methodsDirect and indirect patient contact using camouflaged sampling was used to recruit a stratified random sample of asthmatics, identified based on their receipt of a prescription for a SA beta-agonist. Volunteers were recruited through media advertising. Recruitment rates were determined for both indirect and direct patient contact, and sampled participants were compared to volunteers recruited through media advertising for differences in SA beta-agonist use, demographic socioeconomic factors, and pulmonary function.
results109 and 93 participants were recruited through camouflaged sampling and media advertising, respectively. Direct and indirect patient contact resulted in recruitment rates of 5 and 9%, respectively. Sampled participants were more heterogeneous for SA beta-agonist use, older, more likely to smoke or receive social assistance, and of lower socioeconomic status (SES) than volunteers. There was no difference in the association between SES and the magnitude of SA beta-agonist use between recruiting methods.
conclusionsAlthough recruitment rates were lower than anticipated, camouflaged sampling facilitated stratified sampling of a targeted population and resulted in a more heterogeneous sample while protecting patient privacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15330123What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.