Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2004
Steady-state plasma and intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cethromycin.
Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- A microdose study of ¹⁴C-AR-709 in healthy men: pharmacokinetics, absolute bioavailability and concentrations in key compartments of the lung.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2013Trial
- Cethromycin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for single dose cure ofAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025Article
- Biomarker-Driven Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of Polymyxin B in Critically Ill Patients with XDR-GN Pneumonia.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparison of Plasma and Intrapulmonary Concentrations of Nafithromycin (WCK 4873) in Healthy Adult Subjects.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2017Article
- The Epidemiologic and Pharmacodynamic Cutoff Values of Tilmicosin against Haemophilus parasuis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2016Article
- Penetration of anti-infective agents into pulmonary epithelial lining fluid: focus on antibacterial agents.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2011Review
- Ketolides--the modern relatives of macrolides : the pharmacokinetic perspective.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2009Review
- Interpretation of antibiotic concentration ratios measured in epithelial lining fluid.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2008Review
- Multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae infections: current and future therapeutic options.Drugs · 2007Review
- Cellular uptake and efflux of azithromycin, erythromycin, clarithromycin, telithromycin, and cethromycin.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of this study was to determine the steady-state plasma and intrapulmonary pharmacokinetic parameters of orally administered cethromycin in healthy volunteers. The study design included administering 150 or 300 mg of cethromycin once daily to 25 or 35 healthy adult subjects, respectively, for a total of five doses. Standardized and timed bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed after the last dose. Blood was obtained for drug assay prior to the first and last dose, at multiple time points following the last dose, and at the time of BAL. Cethromycin was measured in plasma, BAL, and alveolar cell (AC) by using a combined high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometric technique. Plasma, epithelial lining fluid (ELF), and AC pharmacokinetics were derived by noncompartmental methods. C(max)/90% minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC(90)) ratios, area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)/MIC(90) ratios, intrapulmonary drug exposure ratios, and percent time above MIC(90) during the dosing interval (%T > MIC(90)) were calculated for recently reported respiratory pathogens. The kinetics were nonlinear, i.e., not proportional to dose. In the 150-mg-dose group, the C(max) (mean +/- standard deviations), AUC(0-24), and half-life for plasma were 0.181 +/- 0.084 microg/ml, 0.902 +/- 0.469 microg. h/ml, and 4.85 +/- 1.10 h, respectively; for ELF the values were 0.9 +/- 0.2 microg/ml, 11.4 microg. h/ml, and 6.43 h, respectively; for AC the values were 12.7 +/- 6.4 microg/ml, 160.8 microg. h/ml, and 10.0 h, respectively. In the 300-mg-dose group, the C(max) (mean +/- standard deviations), AUC(0-24), and half-life for plasma were 0.500 +/- 0.168 microg/ml, 3.067 +/- 1.205 microg. h/ml, and 4.94 +/- 0.66 h, respectively; for ELF the values were 2.7 +/- 2.0 microg/ml, 24.15 microg. h/ml, and 5.26 h, respectively; for AC the values were 55.4 +/- 38.7 microg/ml, 636.2 microg. h/ml, and 11.6 h, respectively. We concluded that the C(max)/MIC(90) ratios, AUC/MIC(90) ratios, %T > MIC(90) values, and extended plasma and intrapulmonary half-lives provide a pharmacokinetic rationale for once-daily administration and are favorable for the treatment of cethromycin-susceptible pulmonary infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.