ReviewOncogene2004
International variation.
Review in Oncogene, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03428568 (Open Label, Randomized, Single Site Clinical Trial To Compare The Safety Of Herbal Melanin Extracted From Nigella Sativa Seeds Vs Standard Of Care Treatment In Treating Gastritis Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 240 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Open Label, Randomized, Single Site Clinical Trial To Compare The Safety Of Herbal Melanin Extracted From Nigella Sativa Seeds Vs Standard Of Care Treatment In Treating Gastritis Patients
Who cites it
240 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Predictive value of β-catenin in bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Bioscience reports · 2020Pooled it
- Dietary patterns derived from principal component analysis (PCA) and risk of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2019Pooled it
- Long-Term Outcomes Comparison of Endoscopic Resection With Gastrectomy for Treatment of Early Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Pooled it
- Association of CYP2E1 gene polymorphisms with bladder cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Potato consumption and risk of pancreatic cancer in the HELGA cohort.The British journal of nutrition · 2018Pooled it
- What is the quantitative risk of gastric cancer in the first-degree relatives of patients? A meta-analysis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2017Pooled it
- Dairy product consumption and gastric cancer risk: a meta-analysis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Pooled it
- Effect of gastrectomy with bursectomy on prognosis of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Pooled it
- Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection worldwide: a systematic review of studies with national coverage.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2014Pooled it
- XRCC1 and XPD genetic polymorphisms and clinical outcomes of gastric cancer patients treated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy: a meta-analysis.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014Pooled it
- Histological changes of gastric mucosa after Helicobacter pylori eradication: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Pooled it
- Ethnic background and genetic variation in the evaluation of cancer risk: a systematic review.PloS one · 2014Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of the association of CYP1A1 polymorphisms with gastric cancer susceptibility and interaction with tobacco smoking.Molecular biology reports · 2012Pooled it
- Fermented and non-fermented soy food consumption and gastric cancer in Japanese and Korean populations: a meta-analysis of observational studies.Cancer science · 2011Pooled it
- Cyclooxygenase-2 polymorphisms and susceptibility to gastric carcinoma: a meta-analysis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2010Pooled it
- Using genetic proxies for lifecourse sun exposure to assess the causal relationship of sun exposure with circulating vitamin d and prostate cancer risk.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2013Trial
- Phase III multicenter clinical trial of the sialyl-TN (STn)-keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) vaccine for metastatic breast cancer.The oncologist · 2011Trial
- Potential pathogenesis ofFuture science OA · 2026Article
- Engaging migrants and immigrants in genetics research.Nature genetics · 2025Review
- The effect of receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) expression on the occurrence, development, and prognosis of gastric cancer.Updates in surgery · 2025Article
180 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There were an estimated 10 million new cases, 6 million deaths and 22 million persons living with cancer in the year 2000. The most common cancers are, in terms of new cases, lung (1.2 million), breast (1.05 million), colon-rectum (945 000), stomach (876 000) and liver (564 000). The geographic distributions of some 20 types of cancer for which national estimates have been made are summarized. These patterns are examined with respect to the likely reasons in terms of variation in exposure to carcinogens (in the external environment or through lifestyle choices) or in genetic susceptibility to them. Related data from studies of migrant populations (that allow comparisons of genetically similar populations living in different environments) and from comparisons between different ethnic groups living in the same country are used to help in the interpretation of the geographic patterns. Information on the burden of disease also has a very important role in the planning and monitoring of programmes of cancer control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15322508What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.