Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15321952›Full record

ReviewArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition2004

Universal neonatal hearing screening moving from evidence to practice.

C Kennedy, D McCann

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genetic Analysis of theFrontiers in genetics · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Preserving Inhibition during Developmental Hearing Loss Rescues Auditory Learning and Perception.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Newborn hearing screening in the Campania region (Italy): early language and perceptual outcomes of infants with permanent hearing loss.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Factors influencing parental decision about genetics evaluation for their deaf or hard-of-hearing child.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2009
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Multiprofessional committee on auditory health: COMUSA.Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C KennedyChild Health, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK. crk1@soton.ac.uk
D McCann
Southampton General Hospital · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent technological advances have made feasible universal newborn hearing screening and therefore early detection of permanent childhood hearing impairment. Over the past three years, new information has been published on whether early intervention is beneficial, the possibility of harm arising from newborn screening, and its cost. Dramatic progress has been made in the large scale implementation of universal screening in many parts of the western world.

Indexed as

Health PolicyHearing DisordersHumansInfant, NewbornLanguage DevelopmentNeonatal ScreeningSpeech

Identifiers

PMID15321952
PMCPMC1721742
OpenAlexW2151310230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.