Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15321906›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2004

The legacy of Bristol: public disclosure of individual surgeons' results.

Bruce Keogh, David Spiegelhalter, Alan Bailey, James Roxburgh, Patrick Magee, Colin Hilton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Does providing feedback on patient-reported outcomes to healthcare professionals result in better outcomes for patients? A systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2013
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The impact of surgical training on early and long-term outcomes after isolated aortic valve surgery.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Variation between hospitals in outcomes following cardiac surgery in the UK.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2019
    Article
  11. Disclosure of surgeon experience.World journal of surgery · 2014
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Can mortality monitoring in general practice be made to work?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2005
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bruce KeoghSociety of Cardiothoracic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London WC2A 3PE. Bruce.Keogh@uclh.org
David Spiegelhalter
Alan Bailey
James Roxburgh
Patrick Magee
Colin Hilton

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceDisclosureEnglandHospital MortalityHumansNew JerseyNew YorkPennsylvaniaPhysiciansPublishingRisk AssessmentThoracic SurgeryThoracic Surgical ProceduresEmpirical ApproachHealth Care and Public Health

Identifiers

PMID15321906
PMCPMC514215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.