Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15319862›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2004

Neutralizing antibodies in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus infection.

Yuchun Nie, Guangwen Wang, Xuanling Shi, Hong Zhang, Yan Qiu, Zhongping He, Wei Wang, Gewei Lian, Xiaolei Yin, Liying Du and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 151 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. From Pandemicity to Endemicity: The Journey of SARS-CoV-2.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. COVID-19 versus SARS: A comparative review.Journal of infection and public health · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Simultaneous CD8Vaccines · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Yuchun NieDepartment of Cell Biology and Genetics, College of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Guangwen Wang
Xuanling Shi
Hong Zhang
Yan Qiu
Zhongping He
Wei Wang
Gewei Lian
Xiaolei Yin
Liying Du
Lili Ren
Jianwei Wang
Xiong He
Taisheng Li
Hongkui Deng
Mingxiao Ding
Peking University · CNNational Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention · CNBeijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control · CNBeijing Ditan Hospital · CNBeijing Red Cross Blood Center · CNPeking Union Medical College Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSevere acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) is the principal etiologic agent of SARS. We analyzed serum samples obtained from 623 patients with SARS in Beijing, to determine whether infection with SARS-CoV can elicit neutralizing antibodies (NAbs).

methodsWe developed a highly sensitive and safe neutralization assay using the SARS-CoV pseudotyped virus and used this assay to determine the titers of the NAbs in serum samples from patients with SARS.

resultsWe found that 85.9% of serum samples contained NAbs against SARS-CoV and that most of the NAb activities could be attributed to immunoglobulin G. The NAbs became detectable first at 5-10 days after the onset of symptoms, and their levels peaked at 20-30 days and then were sustained for >150 days. The serum samples could neutralize the pseudotype particles bearing the spike glycoproteins from different SARS-CoV strains, suggesting that the NAbs to SARS-CoV were broadly reactive.

conclusionsNAbs to SARS-CoV are broadly elicited in patients with SARS and, according to their kinetics, may correlate with viral load during the early stages of the disease. These results suggest that it is possible to develop effective vaccines against SARS and that NAbs provide a potential strategy for treating patients with SARS.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ViralEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFlow CytometryHumansImmunoglobulin GImmunologic TechniquesKineticsMembrane GlycoproteinsNeutralization TestsSevere Acute Respiratory SyndromeSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusViral Envelope ProteinsViral LoadAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin GMembrane GlycoproteinsSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusViral Envelope Proteins

Identifiers

PMID15319862
PMCPMC7199490
OpenAlexW2169650241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.