ArticleAnnals of surgery2004
Carotid endarterectomy at the millennium: what interventional therapy must match.
Article in Annals of surgery, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02808754 (Remote Ischemic Preconditioning for Carotid Endarterectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Remote Ischemic Preconditioning for Carotid Endarterectomy
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictors of Late Adverse Outcomes After Carotid Endarterectomy.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Quantifying Carotid Stenosis: History, Current Applications, Limitations, and Potential: How Imaging Is Changing the Scenario.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Revitalizing neurosurgical frontiers: The EANS frontiers in neurosurgery committee's strategic framework.Brain & spine · 2024Article
- Body Mass Index and Late Adverse Outcomes after a Carotid Endarterectomy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Risk Factors of Cerebral Infarction and Myocardial Infarction after Carotid Endarterectomy Analyzed by Machine Learning.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2020Article
- Article
- Somatosensory Evoked Potentials and Electroencephalography during Carotid Endarterectomy Predict Late Stroke but not Death.Annals of vascular surgery · 2017Article
- Protamine reduces bleeding complications associated with carotid endarterectomy without increasing the risk of stroke.Journal of vascular surgery · 2010Article
- Carotid Endarterectomy: experience in 8743 cases.HSR proceedings in intensive care & cardiovascular anesthesia · 2009Article
- Critical appraisal of medical devices in the management of cerebrovascular disease.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2008Article
- Carotid stenting done exclusively by vascular surgeons: first 175 cases.Annals of surgery · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesCarotid endarterectomy (CEA) is supported by level 1 evidence as the standard treatment of severe carotid stenosis in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. As interventional techniques are emerging for treatment of this disease, this study was undertaken to provide a contemporary surgical standard for comparison to carotid stenting. PATIENTS AND
methodsDuring the interval 1989 to 1999, 2236 isolated CEAs were performed on 1897 patients (62% male, 36% symptomatic, 4.6% reoperative procedures). Study endpoints included perioperative events, patient survival, late incidence of stroke, anatomic durability of CEA, and resource utilization changes during the study. Variables associated with complications, long-term and stroke free survival, restenosis, and resource utilization were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis.
resultsPerioperative complications occurred in 5.5% of CEA procedures, including any stroke/death (1.4%), neck hematoma (1.7%), cardiac complications (0.5%), and cranial nerve injury (0.4%). Actuarial survival at 5 and 10 years was 72.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 69.3-73.5) and 44.7% (95% CI 41.7-47.9) respectively, with coronary artery disease (P < 0.0018), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P < 0.00018) and diabetes mellitus (P < 0.0011) correlating with decreased longevity. The age- and sex-adjusted incidence of any stroke during follow-up was reduced by 22% (upper 0.35, lower 0.08) of predicted with the patient classification of hyperlipidemia (P < 0.0045) as the only protective factor. Analysis of CEA anatomic durability during a median follow-up period of 5.9 years identified a 7.7% failure rate (severe restenosis/occlusion, 4.5%; or reoperative CEA, 3.2%) with elevated serum cholesterol (P < 0.017) correlating with early restenosis. Resource utilization diminished (first versus last 2-year interval periods) for average hospital length of stay from 10.3 +/- 1.5 days to 4.3 +/- 0.7 days (P < 0.01) and preoperative contrast angiography from 87% +/- 1.4% to 10.3% +/- 4%.
conclusionsThese data delineate the safety, durability, and effectiveness in long-term stroke prevention of CEA. They provide a standard to which emerging catheter-based therapies for carotid stenosis should be compared.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.