Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15319714›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery2004

Discrimination of benign and malignant thyroid nodules by molecular profiling.

David J Finley, Baixin Zhu, Catherine B Barden, Thomas J Fahey

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00297297 (Preoperative Selection of Solitary Solid Cold Thyroid Nodules - A Prospective Study on the Value of Sonography, Cytology, Immunostaining and Molecular Profiling), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00297297 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2008, after this paper: background citation

Preoperative Selection of Solitary Solid Cold Thyroid Nodules - A Prospective Study on the Value of Sonography, Cytology, Immunostaining and Molecular Profiling

TypeobservationalSponsorHerlev HospitalRan2008 to 2011Enrolled100ConditionsThyroid NodulesArmsNo intervention. Applying gene profiling on needle aspirates
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The new molecular markers DDIT3, STT3A, ARG2 and FAM129A are not useful in diagnosing thyroid follicular tumors.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David J FinleyDepartment of Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
Baixin Zhu
Catherine B Barden
Thomas J Fahey

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe evaluation of thyroid nodules by fine-needle aspiration has been the standard for almost 30 years, despite significant shortcomings in sensitivity and specificity. Recent data from our laboratory have suggested that molecular profiling permits the discrimination of specific types of thyroid nodules. These studies were undertaken to determine whether molecular profiling can discriminate between benign and malignant thyroid nodules with the necessary sensitivity and specificity required of a screening test.

methodsMolecular profiles of 11 papillary thyroid carcinomas, 13 follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinomas, 9 follicular thyroid carcinomas, and 26 benign tumors (follicular adenomas and hyperplastic nodules) were analyzed by oligonucleotide microarray analysis. A gene list was created based on 45 samples. Seventeen samples were then added to the analysis as unknowns. A hierarchical clustering analysis was performed on all 62 samples to examine the groups for potential differences and the ability of the gene list to distinguish tumor types.

resultsCluster analysis of all 62 samples produced 2 distinct groups, 1 containing the carcinomas and 1 containing the benign lesions. The sensitivity for a diagnosis of cancer was 91.7% with a specificity of 96.2% (3 follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinomas clustered with the benign lesions). The cancer gene profiles contained both known cancer-associated genes (MET, galectin-3) and previously unidentified genes.

conclusionsMolecular profiling readily distinguishes between benign and malignant thyroid tumors with excellent sensitivity and specificity. Elucidated genes may provide insight into the molecular pathogenesis of thyroid cancer. Gene profiling may significantly enhance the evaluation of thyroid nodules in the future.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisSensitivity and SpecificityThyroid NeoplasmsThyroid Nodule

Identifiers

PMID15319714
PMCPMC1356433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.