Trial reportClinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society2004
Effects of inspiratory impedance on the carotid-cardiac baroreflex response in humans.
Trial report in Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- A Transfer Entropy Approach for the Assessment of the Impact of Inspiratory Muscle Training on the Cardiorespiratory Coupling of Amateur Cyclists.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Article
- Postexercise syncope: Wingate syncope test and effective countermeasure.Experimental physiology · 2014Article
- Optimizing the respiratory pump: harnessing inspiratory resistance to treat systemic hypotension.Respiratory care · 2011Review
- Effects of inspiratory impedance on hemodynamic responses to a squat-stand test in human volunteers: implications for treatment of orthostatic hypotension.European journal of applied physiology · 2005Article
- [Treatment of hemorrhagic shock. New therapy options].Der Anaesthesist · 2004Review
- Modulation of baroreflex function by altering inspiratory impedance: potential mechanisms and clinical implications.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We were interested in a therapeutic device designed to increase carotid-cardiac baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) since high BRS is associated with a lower risk for development of hypotension in humans with experimentally-induced central hypovolemia. We hypothesized that spontaneous breathing through an impedance threshold device (ITD) designed to increase negative intrathoracic pressure during inspiration and elevate arterial blood pressure would acutely increase BRS in humans. We tested this hypothesis by measuring heart rate (HR), systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressures, and carotid-cardiac BRS in 10 female and 10 male subjects breathing through a face mask at three separate ITD conditions: (a) 6 cm H(2)O; (b) 12 cm H(2)O; and (c) a control (0 cm H(2)O). HR was increased (P = 0. 013) from 64 +/- 3 bpm during control to 68 +/- 3 bpm at 6 cm H(2)O ITD and 71 +/- 4 bpm at 12 cm H(2)O ITD breathing conditions. During ITD breathing, BRS was not altered but responses were shifted to higher arterial pressures. However, SBP and DBP were elevated for both the 6 and 12 cm H(2)O conditions compared to the 0 cm H(2)O condition, but returned to control (sham) levels by 30 minutes after cessation of ITD breathing. There were no gender effects for BRS or any hemodynamic responses to breathing through the ITD. We conclude that breathing with inspiratory impedance at relatively low pressures can increase baseline arterial blood pressure, i. e., reset the operational point for SBP on the baroreflex stimulus-response relationship, in healthy subjects. This resetting of the cardiac baroreflex may represent a mechanism that allows blood pressure to increase without a reflex-mediated reduction in HR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.