Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15316841›Full record

Trial reportClinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society2004

Effects of inspiratory impedance on the carotid-cardiac baroreflex response in humans.

Victor A Convertino, Duane A Ratliff, Kathy L Ryan, William H Cooke, Donald F Doerr, David A Ludwig, Gary W Muniz, Deanna L Britton, Savran D Clah, Kathleen B Fernald and 3 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Modulation of baroreflex function by altering inspiratory impedance: potential mechanisms and clinical implications.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2004
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Victor A ConvertinoUS Army Institute of Surgical Research, 3400 Rawley E. Chambers Avenue Building 3611, Fort Sam Houston (TX) 78234-6315, USA. victor.convertino@amedd.army.mil
Duane A Ratliff
Kathy L Ryan
William H Cooke
Donald F Doerr
David A Ludwig
Gary W Muniz
Deanna L Britton
Savran D Clah
Kathleen B Fernald
Alicia F Ruiz
Ahamed Idris
Keith G Lurie
Kennedy Space Center · USUnited States Army Institute of Surgical Research · USBionetics (United States) · USPrevention Institute · USProfessional Services Group (United States) · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We were interested in a therapeutic device designed to increase carotid-cardiac baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) since high BRS is associated with a lower risk for development of hypotension in humans with experimentally-induced central hypovolemia. We hypothesized that spontaneous breathing through an impedance threshold device (ITD) designed to increase negative intrathoracic pressure during inspiration and elevate arterial blood pressure would acutely increase BRS in humans. We tested this hypothesis by measuring heart rate (HR), systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressures, and carotid-cardiac BRS in 10 female and 10 male subjects breathing through a face mask at three separate ITD conditions: (a) 6 cm H(2)O; (b) 12 cm H(2)O; and (c) a control (0 cm H(2)O). HR was increased (P = 0. 013) from 64 +/- 3 bpm during control to 68 +/- 3 bpm at 6 cm H(2)O ITD and 71 +/- 4 bpm at 12 cm H(2)O ITD breathing conditions. During ITD breathing, BRS was not altered but responses were shifted to higher arterial pressures. However, SBP and DBP were elevated for both the 6 and 12 cm H(2)O conditions compared to the 0 cm H(2)O condition, but returned to control (sham) levels by 30 minutes after cessation of ITD breathing. There were no gender effects for BRS or any hemodynamic responses to breathing through the ITD. We conclude that breathing with inspiratory impedance at relatively low pressures can increase baseline arterial blood pressure, i. e., reset the operational point for SBP on the baroreflex stimulus-response relationship, in healthy subjects. This resetting of the cardiac baroreflex may represent a mechanism that allows blood pressure to increase without a reflex-mediated reduction in HR.

Indexed as

AdultAirway ResistanceBaroreflexBlood PressureCarotid ArteriesFemaleHeartHeart RateHumansMaleRespiratory Function TestsRespiratory MechanicsSex CharacteristicsTidal VolumeVagus Nerve

Identifiers

PMID15316841
OpenAlexW2157796813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.