Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15316712›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2005

A pre-clinical study showing how dopaminergic drugs administered during pre-exposure can impair or facilitate latent inhibition.

N A Schmajuk, J A Gray, J A Larrauri

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

N A SchmajukDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
J A Gray
J A Larrauri
Duke University · USPsychiatry Research Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleIt has been suggested that, in classical conditioning, dopamine (DA) codes for (a) attention to the conditioned stimulus (CS) or (b) the intensity of the unconditioned stimulus.

objectivesTo clarify the role of DA in pre-clinical classical conditioning studies.

methodsAn existing model of classical conditioning presented by Schmajuk, Lam, and Gray (J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 22:321-349, 1996) suggests that DA cells in the ventral midbrain area code for the attentionally modulated internal representation of the CS. It is assumed that this representation is increased by dopaminergic agonists and decreased by dopaminergic antagonists. Computer simulations with the model describe the effect of nicotine and haloperidol on latent inhibition.

resultsSimulations replicate experimental results demonstrating that both nicotine and haloperidol affect latent inhibition when administered during the pre-exposure phase. In addition, the model reproduces data showing that administration of nicotine or haloperidol results in the impairment or facilitation of latent inhibition depending on the duration of CS or the number of CSs.

conclusionsThe model demonstrates that pre-clinical experimental results, including cell activity and pharmacological data, are consistent with an attentional role for DA in classical conditioning.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalComputer SimulationConditioning, ClassicalDopamine AgonistsDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHaloperidolHumansModels, NeurologicalNicotinePsychopharmacologyTime FactorsDopamine AgonistsHaloperidolNicotine

Identifiers

PMID15316712
OpenAlexW2029503816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.