Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15315995›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2004

Fluoxetine, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and their combination for adolescents with depression: Treatment for Adolescents With Depression Study (TADS) randomized controlled trial.

John March, Susan Silva, Stephen Petrycki, John Curry, Karen Wells, John Fairbank, Barbara Burns, Marisa Domino, Steven McNulty, Benedetto Vitiello and 2 more

6 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 6 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 514 papers, 24 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
514citing papers in PubMed, 24 pooled it
150.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00006286 phase3completednot on this map

Treatment for Adolescents With Depression Study (TADS)

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Ran1998 to 2004Enrolled432ConditionsMajor Depressive Disorder, DepressionArmsFluoxetine, Psychotherapy
NCT02072304 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Study of Web-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Adolescent Depression; Randomized Controlled Trial for Korean Adolescents

TypeinterventionalSponsorHallym University Medical CenterRan2014 to 2015Enrolled164ConditionsDepression, Mental Disorder in Adolescence, Cognitive Behavioral TherapyArmsweb-based CBT, supportive care
NCT05390918 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Targeting Adolescent Insomnia to Lessen Overall Risk of Suicidal Behavior

TypeinterventionalSponsorJeff BridgeRan2022 to 2027Enrolled235ConditionsInsomnia, Suicidal Ideation, Suicide, AttemptedArmsTAILOR, Enhanced Usual Care
NCT05814640 phase1 / phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Adolescent Depression (STAR-AD): a Pragmatic Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFirst Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityRan2023 to 2027Enrolled520ConditionsDepression, SequestraArmsFluoxetine, Sertraline, Vortioxetine, Duloxetine, Aripiprazole
NCT06018285 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Stepped Approach to Reducing Risk of Suicide in Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorCynthia FontanellaRan2023 to 2027Enrolled2,572ConditionsSuicidal Ideation, Suicide, Attempted, Suicide PreventionArmsStepped Approach to Reducing Risk of Suicide in Primary Care
NCT07185438 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility, Safety, and Preliminary Clinical Efficacy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in Adolescents With Depression: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorFirst Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityRan2025 to 2027Enrolled45ConditionsDepression - Major Depressive DisorderArmsExperimental target rTMS treatment, Conventional target rTMS treatment, Sham stimulation treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

514 citing papers in PubMed, 24 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,726 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

454 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John MarchDuke Clinical Research Institute, Department of Psychiatry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA. jsmarch@acpub.duke.edu
Susan Silva
Stephen Petrycki
John Curry
Karen Wells
John Fairbank
Barbara Burns
Marisa Domino
Steven McNulty
Benedetto Vitiello
Joanne Severe
Treatment for Adolescents With Depression Study (TADS) Team
Duke University Hospital · US

Funding

DS NIH HHS 98-DS-0008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextInitial treatment of major depressive disorder in adolescents may include cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) or a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). However, little is known about their relative or combined effectiveness.

objectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of 4 treatments among adolescents with major depressive disorder. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsRandomized controlled trial of a volunteer sample of 439 patients between the ages of 12 to 17 years with a primary Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, diagnosis of major depressive disorder. The trial was conducted at 13 US academic and community clinics between spring 2000 and summer 2003.

interventionsTwelve weeks of (1) fluoxetine alone (10 to 40 mg/d), (2) CBT alone, (3) CBT with fluoxetine (10 to 40 mg/d), or (4) placebo (equivalent to 10 to 40 mg/d). Placebo and fluoxetine alone were administered double-blind; CBT alone and CBT with fluoxetine were administered unblinded.

main outcome measuresChildren's Depression Rating Scale-Revised total score and, for responder analysis, a (dichotomized) Clinical Global Impressions improvement score.

resultsCompared with placebo, the combination of fluoxetine with CBT was statistically significant (P =.001) on the Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised. Compared with fluoxetine alone (P =.02) and CBT alone (P =.01), treatment of fluoxetine with CBT was superior. Fluoxetine alone is a superior treatment to CBT alone (P =.01). Rates of response for fluoxetine with CBT were 71.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 62%-80%); fluoxetine alone, 60.6% (95% CI, 51%-70%); CBT alone, 43.2% (95% CI, 34%-52%); and placebo, 34.8% (95% CI, 26%-44%). On the Clinical Global Impressions improvement responder analysis, the 2 fluoxetine-containing conditions were statistically superior to CBT and to placebo. Clinically significant suicidal thinking, which was present in 29% of the sample at baseline, improved significantly in all 4 treatment groups. Fluoxetine with CBT showed the greatest reduction (P =.02). Seven (1.6%) of 439 patients attempted suicide; there were no completed suicides.

conclusionThe combination of fluoxetine with CBT offered the most favorable tradeoff between benefit and risk for adolescents with major depressive disorder.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyAdolescentAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFluoxetineHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMalePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesRiskSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsSuicideAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationFluoxetineSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID15315995
OpenAlexW2254051562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.