Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15314653›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2004

Retroviral DNA integration: ASLV, HIV, and MLV show distinct target site preferences.

Rick S Mitchell, Brett F Beitzel, Astrid R W Schroder, Paul Shinn, Huaming Chen, Charles C Berry, Joseph R Ecker, Frederic D Bushman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 523 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
523citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

523 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Gene therapy then and now: A look back at changes in the field over the past 25 years.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

463 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rick S MitchellDepartment of Microbiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Brett F Beitzel
Astrid R W Schroder
Paul Shinn
Huaming Chen
Charles C Berry
Joseph R Ecker
Frederic D Bushman

Funding

Favored Sites for HIV Integration in the Human GenomeR01AI052845 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BUSHMAN, FREDERIC D · 2002 to 2017
$5.6M
MECHANISM OF HIV DNA INTEGRATIONR01AI034786 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BUSHMAN, FREDERIC D · 1993 to 2005
$2.3M
NIAID NIH HHS AI34786NIAID NIH HHS AI52845NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI034786NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI052845
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The completion of the human genome sequence has made possible genome-wide studies of retroviral DNA integration. Here we report an analysis of 3,127 integration site sequences from human cells. We compared retroviral vectors derived from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), avian sarcoma-leukosis virus (ASLV), and murine leukemia virus (MLV). Effects of gene activity on integration targeting were assessed by transcriptional profiling of infected cells. Integration by HIV vectors, analyzed in two primary cell types and several cell lines, strongly favored active genes. An analysis of the effects of tissue-specific transcription showed that it resulted in tissue-specific integration targeting by HIV, though the effect was quantitatively modest. Chromosomal regions rich in expressed genes were favored for HIV integration, but these regions were found to be interleaved with unfavorable regions at CpG islands. MLV vectors showed a strong bias in favor of integration near transcription start sites, as reported previously. ASLV vectors showed only a weak preference for active genes and no preference for transcription start regions. Thus, each of the three retroviruses studied showed unique integration site preferences, suggesting that virus-specific binding of integration complexes to chromatin features likely guides site selection.

Indexed as

CpG IslandsDNA, ViralVirus IntegrationAvian Sarcoma VirusesBinding SitesCell LineChromatinChromosomes, HumanGenome, HumanHeLa CellsHIVHumansLeukemia Virus, MurineLeukocytes, MononuclearModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence DataChromatinDNA, ViralOligonucleotides

Identifiers

PMID15314653
PMCPMC509299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.