Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15314030›Full record

ArticleGenes & development2004

RNA length defines RNA export pathway.

Kaoru Masuyama, Ichiro Taniguchi, Naoyuki Kataoka, Mutsuhito Ohno

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genes & development, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. CircRNAs and their regulatory roles in cancers.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Short interspersed nuclear element (SINE)-mediated post-transcriptional effects on human and mouse gene expression: SINE-UP for active duty.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kaoru MasuyamaInstitute for Virus Research, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Ichiro Taniguchi
Naoyuki Kataoka
Mutsuhito Ohno

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different RNA species are exported from the nucleus by distinct mechanisms. Among the different RNAs, mRNAs and major spliceosomal U snRNAs share several structural similarities, yet they are exported by distinct factors. We previously showed that U1 snRNAs behaved like an mRNA in nuclear export if various approximately 300-nucleotide fragments were inserted in a central position. Here we show that this export switch is dependent on the length of the insertion but independent of its position, indicating unequivocally that this switch is indeed the result of RNA length. We also show that intronless mRNAs can be progressively converted to use the U snRNA export pathway if the mRNAs are progressively shortened by deletion. In addition, immunoprecipitation experiments show that the protein composition of export RNPs is influenced by RNA length. These findings indicate that RNA length is one of the key determinants of the choice of RNA export pathway. Based on these results and previous observations, a unified model of how an RNA is committed to a specific export pathway is proposed.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalActive Transport, Cell NucleusAnimalsCell NucleusMicroinjectionsNuclear ProteinsOocytesPrecipitin TestsRecombinant ProteinsRNA, MessengerRNA, Small NuclearXenopusNuclear ProteinsRecombinant ProteinsRNA, MessengerRNA, Small NuclearU1 small nuclear RNA

Identifiers

PMID15314030
PMCPMC515286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.