Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15310686›Full record

ArticleHeart (British Cardiac Society)2004

Improving care for patients with acute coronary syndromes: initial results from the National Audit of Myocardial Infarction Project (MINAP).

J S Birkhead, L Walker, M Pearson, C Weston, A D Cunningham, A F Rickards, National Audit of Myocardial Infarction Project Steering Group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01359033 (Compare the Patient Risk and Between-hospital Variation in Myocardial Infarction Mortality in the United Kingdom and Sweden), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01359033 completednot on this mapstarted 2011, after this paper: background citation

Compare the Patient Risk and Between-hospital Variation in Myocardial Infarction Mortality in the United Kingdom and Sweden

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity College, LondonRan2011 to 2014Enrolled510,863ConditionsAcute Myocardial Infarction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Requirements for a quality dashboard: Lessons from National Clinical Audits.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Audit of diabetic foot care services--a timely initiative.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2015
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Secondary revascularization after CABG surgery.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2012
    Review
  18. The Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP).Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2010
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

J S BirkheadClinical Effectiveness and Evaluation Unit, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK. John.birkhead@ngh.nhs.uk
L Walker
M Pearson
C Weston
A D Cunningham
A F Rickards
National Audit of Myocardial Infarction Project Steering Group
Royal College of Physicians · GBNational Audit Office · GBNorthampton General Hospital · GBRoyal Brompton Hospital · GBSingleton Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the improvements in care that have followed the introduction of an electronic data entry and analysis system providing contemporary feedback on the management of acute coronary syndromes in 230 hospitals in England and Wales.

designObservational study

methodsA secure electronic system was used to transfer encrypted data on patients with acute coronary syndromes from collaborating hospitals to central servers for analysis. Immediate online data entry to the central servers by hospitals allowed contemporary analyses of performance and immediate comparison with the national aggregate performance.

resultsThe records of 156 902 patients receiving a final diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome during three years between October 2000 and September 2003 were analysed. Of 69 113 patients with ST segment elevation infarction, 75.4% received thrombolytic treatment. Between the first and last years of the study the median interval from hospital arrival to treatment fell for eligible patients from 38 (interquartile range 22-58) to 20 (interquartile range 14-28) minutes. By mid 2003 77.6% were receiving thrombolytic treatment within 30 minutes of arrival. The proportion treated within two hours of onset of symptoms increased from 32.5% to 40.3% (a difference of 7.8 percentage points, p < 0.0001). The use of secondary prevention medication for acute coronary syndromes increased over this period: angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, 62.4% to 72.4%; beta blockers, 76.3% to 82.6%; statins, 69.6% to 83.8%; and aspirin, 89.3% to 90.2%.

conclusionThe provision of contemporary online performance analyses has underpinned substantial improvement in the care of patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Indexed as

HospitalizationQuality of Health CareAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAgedAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsEnglandFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMaleMedical AuditMyocardial InfarctionSyndromeThrombolytic TherapyTime FactorsWalesAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID15310686
PMCPMC1768423
OpenAlexW2141999042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.