Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15310657›Full record

ArticleGenome research2004

Insertion of telomeric repeats at intrachromosomal break sites during primate evolution.

Solomon G Nergadze, Mariano Rocchi, Claus M Azzalin, Chiara Mondello, Elena Giulotto

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Molecular Dynamics and Evolution of Centromeres in the Genus Equus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. TAR30, a homolog of the canonical plant TTTAGGG telomeric repeat, is enriched in the proximal chromosome regions of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.).Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Interspecific cytogenetic relationships in threeComparative cytogenetics · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Telomeres and genomic evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Comparative cytogenetics of tree frogs of theComparative cytogenetics · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Solomon G NergadzeDipartimento di Genetica e Microbiologia, Università degli Studi di Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Mariano Rocchi
Claus M Azzalin
Chiara Mondello
Elena Giulotto

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Short blocks of telomeric-like DNA (Interstitial Telomeric Sequences, ITSs) are found far from chromosome ends. We addressed the question as to how such sequences arise by comparing the loci of 10 human ITSs with their genomic orthologs in 12 primate species. The ITSs did not derive from expansion of pre-existing TTAGGG units, as described for other microsatellites, but appeared suddenly during evolution. Nine insertion events were dated along the primate evolutionary tree, the dates ranging between 40 and 6 million years ago. Sequence comparisons suggest that in each case the block of (TTAGGG)n DNA arose as a result of double-strand break repair. In fact, ancestral sequences were either interrupted precisely by the tract of telomeric-like repeats or showed the typical modifications observed at double-strand break repair sites such as short deletions, addition of random sequences, or duplications. Similar conclusions were drawn from the analysis of a chimpanzee-specific ITS. We propose that telomeric sequences were inserted by the capture of a telomeric DNA fragment at the break site or by the telomerase enzyme. Our conclusions indicate that human ITSs are relics of ancient breakage rather than fragile sites themselves, as previously suggested.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsBase SequenceChromosome BreakageChromosomesDNA Transposable ElementsHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMetaphaseMolecular Sequence DataPan troglodytesRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidTelomereDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID15310657
PMCPMC515315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.